Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board
BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Basketball
Topic:  RE: No more Russell Athletic?

Topic:  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
Author
Message
bobcat2nc
General User

Member Since: 12/28/2004
Post Count: 584

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/23/2016 10:06:47 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
SBH wrote:
OUVan wrote:
OhioStunter wrote:
Serious question(s): Other than the shoe quality (which I understand), what is the difference between apparel companies? Why does it matter?


borna pointed out a month or so ago that the apparel companies have serious ties to recruiting. I didn't realize it but I've read in several other places since then how deep they are tied to it. There seems to be some debate over whether it is better to be one of the top programs at a smaller company, like Russell, or one of a bunch behind the big boys at the large companies, like Nike.


One more example of what's wrong with organized athletics. Why go we give a rat's ass about which apparel brand we're aligned with? I played high school basketball in Chuck Taylors and never gave my shoes a second thought. Our high school unis were about 10 years old and I was still damn proud to wear mine.

It's amazing how screwed up our priorities are.


Couldn't agree more SBH. Good old Chuck Nolte in his first year at East had us switch to Pro Keds. They lasted two weeks and we all headed downtown to that sporting goods store on East Market to buy white Chuck high tops for $11.50 a pair. Thanks for the post. I wanted to say the same thing but didn't want to get the old "get off of my lawn" response.


To give a hint at my age, I first played organized ball in a gym where the over and back line was the top off the key at the opposite end. I haven't told anyone to get off my lawn, yet,but I do think the whole multiple fancy uniform thing is nuts.

If Adidas is an upgrade then I guess I am happy for Ohio. Myself, I skip the Adidas athletic wear. I guess that is also partly because of my old fart status. It is hard for someone my age to look good in fitted work out shirts and trim fit golf attire:)
Back to Top
  
bornacatfan
General User



Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,706

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/23/2016 10:09:42 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
SBH wrote:
OUVan wrote:
OhioStunter wrote:
Serious question(s): Other than the shoe quality (which I understand), what is the difference between apparel companies? Why does it matter?


borna pointed out a month or so ago that the apparel companies have serious ties to recruiting. I didn't realize it but I've read in several other places since then how deep they are tied to it. There seems to be some debate over whether it is better to be one of the top programs at a smaller company, like Russell, or one of a bunch behind the big boys at the large companies, like Nike.


One more example of what's wrong with organized athletics. Why go we give a rat's ass about which apparel brand we're aligned with? I played high school basketball in Chuck Taylors and never gave my shoes a second thought. Our high school unis were about 10 years old and I was still damn proud to wear mine.

It's amazing how screwed up our priorities are.


Couldn't agree more SBH. Good old Chuck Nolte in his first year at East had us switch to Pro Keds. They lasted two weeks and we all headed downtown to that sporting goods store on East Market to buy white Chuck high tops for $11.50 a pair. Thanks for the post. I wanted to say the same thing but didn't want to get the old "get off of my lawn" response.


I am not sure *OUR* priorities are all that screwed up....but the ones who count....the athletes that are choosing where they are heading and the guys we expect Saul to assemble into a finely tuned unit have their logos, priorites and likes firnly entrenched.... *they* may be screwed up in your eyes. While you survived in CHucks and the younger gen that considers them cool are not the ones on the court...I would not recommend them in my professional opinion as a good choice to play in considering the advances we have made in biomechanics and knowledge of injury prevention. Prectically speaking ....your beloved Chucks have gone the way of cotton/satin unis and wool jersies. I don't care if you are on the lawn but asking our athletes to perform in archaic materials is ludicrous. I am not defending their penchant for selecting a School based on sponsorship but it is the reality ....and as screwed up as that is...it is what it is...

Lord knows you 2 are the first to complain if the product on the floor is not up to your high standards. I have seen enough in the Chat rooms and on the board to see any dip in quality as being acceptable to y'all

never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer.....

The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game

Back to Top
  
The Pessimist
General User



Member Since: 3/12/2005
Location: Allentown, PA
Post Count: 145

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 12:06:18 AM 
Don't understand how much his stuff means to our student athletes? Watch the football black uniform reveal again.

https://youtu.be/hAOfNEBZbE4

With all the trouble the NCAA rules apparently are for these kids, I won't begrudge them one bit if they get some fashionable team gear.
Back to Top
  
AudioCat'13
General User

Member Since: 9/30/2007
Location: Nowheresville, OH
Post Count: 164

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 1:47:44 AM 
The Pessimist wrote:
Don't understand how much his stuff means to our student athletes? Watch the football black uniform reveal again.

https://youtu.be/hAOfNEBZbE4

With all the trouble the NCAA rules apparently are for these kids, I won't begrudge them one bit if they get some fashionable team gear.



So if there's a switch I'm assuming it's for all sports? Or is it just a basketball only deal?
Back to Top
  
SBH
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,754

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 10:10:11 AM 
bornacatfan wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
SBH wrote:
OUVan wrote:
OhioStunter wrote:
Serious question(s): Other than the shoe quality (which I understand), what is the difference between apparel companies? Why does it matter?


borna pointed out a month or so ago that the apparel companies have serious ties to recruiting. I didn't realize it but I've read in several other places since then how deep they are tied to it. There seems to be some debate over whether it is better to be one of the top programs at a smaller company, like Russell, or one of a bunch behind the big boys at the large companies, like Nike.


One more example of what's wrong with organized athletics. Why go we give a rat's ass about which apparel brand we're aligned with? I played high school basketball in Chuck Taylors and never gave my shoes a second thought. Our high school unis were about 10 years old and I was still damn proud to wear mine.

It's amazing how screwed up our priorities are.


Couldn't agree more SBH. Good old Chuck Nolte in his first year at East had us switch to Pro Keds. They lasted two weeks and we all headed downtown to that sporting goods store on East Market to buy white Chuck high tops for $11.50 a pair. Thanks for the post. I wanted to say the same thing but didn't want to get the old "get off of my lawn" response.


I am not sure *OUR* priorities are all that screwed up....but the ones who count....the athletes that are choosing where they are heading and the guys we expect Saul to assemble into a finely tuned unit have their logos, priorites and likes firnly entrenched.... *they* may be screwed up in your eyes. While you survived in CHucks and the younger gen that considers them cool are not the ones on the court...I would not recommend them in my professional opinion as a good choice to play in considering the advances we have made in biomechanics and knowledge of injury prevention. Prectically speaking ....your beloved Chucks have gone the way of cotton/satin unis and wool jersies. I don't care if you are on the lawn but asking our athletes to perform in archaic materials is ludicrous. I am not defending their penchant for selecting a School based on sponsorship but it is the reality ....and as screwed up as that is...it is what it is...

Lord knows you 2 are the first to complain if the product on the floor is not up to your high standards. I have seen enough in the Chat rooms and on the board to see any dip in quality as being acceptable to y'all



Ah yes, the "smackdown" from the all-knowing expert on basketball. I never indicated the players should be using outdated foot gear. Can you argue that when "student athletes" are choosing schools based on apparel brand, there's something wrong with the picture? And I retain my right to voice my opinion, Borna. It comes with paying for my tickets and writing checks to the program. Try either one for a change, "y'all."

Last Edited: 11/27/2016 10:15:50 AM by SBH
Back to Top
  
BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 9,486

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 11:20:10 AM 
SBH wrote:
bornacatfan wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
SBH wrote:
OUVan wrote:
OhioStunter wrote:
Serious question(s): Other than the shoe quality (which I understand), what is the difference between apparel companies? Why does it matter?


borna pointed out a month or so ago that the apparel companies have serious ties to recruiting. I didn't realize it but I've read in several other places since then how deep they are tied to it. There seems to be some debate over whether it is better to be one of the top programs at a smaller company, like Russell, or one of a bunch behind the big boys at the large companies, like Nike.


One more example of what's wrong with organized athletics. Why go we give a rat's ass about which apparel brand we're aligned with? I played high school basketball in Chuck Taylors and never gave my shoes a second thought. Our high school unis were about 10 years old and I was still damn proud to wear mine.

It's amazing how screwed up our priorities are.


Couldn't agree more SBH. Good old Chuck Nolte in his first year at East had us switch to Pro Keds. They lasted two weeks and we all headed downtown to that sporting goods store on East Market to buy white Chuck high tops for $11.50 a pair. Thanks for the post. I wanted to say the same thing but didn't want to get the old "get off of my lawn" response.


I am not sure *OUR* priorities are all that screwed up....but the ones who count....the athletes that are choosing where they are heading and the guys we expect Saul to assemble into a finely tuned unit have their logos, priorites and likes firnly entrenched.... *they* may be screwed up in your eyes. While you survived in CHucks and the younger gen that considers them cool are not the ones on the court...I would not recommend them in my professional opinion as a good choice to play in considering the advances we have made in biomechanics and knowledge of injury prevention. Prectically speaking ....your beloved Chucks have gone the way of cotton/satin unis and wool jersies. I don't care if you are on the lawn but asking our athletes to perform in archaic materials is ludicrous. I am not defending their penchant for selecting a School based on sponsorship but it is the reality ....and as screwed up as that is...it is what it is...

Lord knows you 2 are the first to complain if the product on the floor is not up to your high standards. I have seen enough in the Chat rooms and on the board to see any dip in quality as being acceptable to y'all



Ah yes, the "smackdown" from the all-knowing expert on basketball. I never indicated the players should be using outdated foot gear. Can you argue that when "student athletes" are choosing schools based on apparel brand, there's something wrong with the picture? And I retain my right to voice my opinion, Borna. It comes with paying for my tickets and writing checks to the program. Try either one for a change, "y'all."



+1
Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 12:42:50 PM 
SBH being sbh.


And that's not a good thing.


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
bornacatfan
General User



Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,706

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 1:01:28 PM 
AudioCat'13 wrote:
The Pessimist wrote:
Don't understand how much his stuff means to our student athletes? Watch the football black uniform reveal again.

https://youtu.be/hAOfNEBZbE4

With all the trouble the NCAA rules apparently are for these kids, I won't begrudge them one bit if they get some fashionable team gear.



So if there's a switch I'm assuming it's for all sports? Or is it just a basketball only deal?


That's an interesting thought. I would assume our AD is on top of that. As an aside I noticed Purdue is a NIKE basketball school but Volley and other minor sports are tied to Russell

never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer.....

The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game

Back to Top
  
Recovering Journalist
General User

Member Since: 8/17/2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Post Count: 1,839

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 3:10:08 PM 
SBH wrote:


Ah yes, the "smackdown" from the all-knowing expert on basketball. I never indicated the players should be using outdated foot gear. Can you argue that when "student athletes" are choosing schools based on apparel brand, there's something wrong with the picture? And I retain my right to voice my opinion, Borna. It comes with paying for my tickets and writing checks to the program. Try either one for a change, "y'all."



You specifically named the shoe, and implied that in your day, dagnabbit, Chucks and hand-me-down uniforms were good enough. Comfortable and good looking clothes -- and brands -- matter to most athletes. Borna is just supplying a dose of reality. You don't have to like it. He knows a lot more about this kind of stuff than I do, and I am happy to get his insight on here.
Back to Top
  
Recovering Journalist
General User

Member Since: 8/17/2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Post Count: 1,839

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 3:11:19 PM 
AudioCat'13 wrote:


So if there's a switch I'm assuming it's for all sports? Or is it just a basketball only deal?


The Russell deal was for all sports. Seems safe to assume a change would be as well.

http://www.ohiobobcats.com/genrel/082812aad.html

Edit: Since it did cover all sports, I can only imagine that athletes on teams like soccer, volleyball and track and field, where Russell has extremely limited options and very little brand recognition, are very excited for Adidas.

Last Edited: 11/27/2016 3:18:57 PM by Recovering Journalist
Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,024

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 3:26:19 PM 
Recovering Journalist wrote:
SBH wrote:


Ah yes, the "smackdown" from the all-knowing expert on basketball. I never indicated the players should be using outdated foot gear. Can you argue that when "student athletes" are choosing schools based on apparel brand, there's something wrong with the picture? And I retain my right to voice my opinion, Borna. It comes with paying for my tickets and writing checks to the program. Try either one for a change, "y'all."



You specifically named the shoe, and implied that in your day, dagnabbit, Chucks and hand-me-down uniforms were good enough. Comfortable and good looking clothes -- and brands -- matter to most athletes. Borna is just supplying a dose of reality. You don't have to like it. He knows a lot more about this kind of stuff than I do, and I am happy to get his insight on here.


I think you missed the point RJ. I took his comments as valid criticism addressing a change in priorities - a change that he and many others, myself included, have not come to appreciate. My comments simply pointed out a little bit of Akron history that our NE Ohio posters might like - similar to OCF's War of Northern Aggression tidbits. Neither one of us said or implied that "what was good enough for us is good enough for them." With this group of kids, I actually believe that they are more team oriented than any group we've seen in the Convo for quite some time.
Back to Top
  
cc-cat
General User

Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 3,822

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 5:04:25 PM 
The point being made is that these kids are starting to make their making their choice heavily influenced by the kicks they wear. Not the coach, not the education, not the facilities, not the location, not the style of play, etc.

The directing of kids to schools with the "right" shoe deal is not because they "like" the shoe (let's not be naive)), but rather because their AAU coach (and team) is sponsored by the shoe company, and will get a kickback if they direct their players to the "right" school. Yet another example who is ruling the roost
Back to Top
  
bornacatfan
General User



Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,706

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 5:05:34 PM 
SBH wrote:


Ah yes, the "smackdown" from the all-knowing expert on basketball. I never indicated the players should be using outdated foot gear. Can you argue that when "student athletes" are choosing schools based on apparel brand, there's something wrong with the picture? And I retain my right to voice my opinion, Borna. It comes with paying for my tickets and writing checks to the program. Try either one for a change, "y'all."



That was not a smack down. I assume your retort is supposed to be though. If you look, I agreed with you that their priorities are somewhat skewed and different than ours. They are the ones that count..... and we can make judgements on the standards of the next gen just like our parents and grandparents did....but it did not change the onslaught of Rock, anti war, LGBT rights or anything else we and subsequent gens have done.

As for your checks and tickets...I specifically choose to not have any donations or anything published in my name. I am NOT a booster. I am free to talk to parents, athletes and recruits who stop me to ask questions at events and do not fear violating any of the myriad of NCAA standards. If you are scouring through donations looking for a name you are missing a much bigger picture. You cannot have any possible idea RE my contributions or purchases. So, if you want to call me out at least you know why... my car probably has a smaller engine, my bike is probably slower and your anatomy is probably bigger as well. Bravo. You win.

I am not all knowing. Far from it...and I am more than accessible as evidenced by the folks in the Convo who feel comfortable to come up and talk. I appreciate all their ideas, thoughts and opinion and I have never once assumed I am the smarter one in any conversation. That has bad results as my Gramps always taught me that " humility would always be the best attribute you could bring to a conversation" In my area of expertise (medically and especially lower extremity performance) you ranted on things being good enough for you... You and Alan both gave your experience and intimated that you played in old unis and/or Cons and that was good enough. I said IMHO that kids do not roll that way these days and provided why the advances in tech/medical over the years made Chucks obsolete. The statement, by both you and Alan, seemed to show that you did play in those and they were good enough and implied that kids should just accept this, as I read it. I also agreed that *OUR* (you and me) priorities are not that screwed up but we are not the ones who count and said "I am not defending" their choices. . It is not up to me to dictate or even really comment on how the next gen approaches life/school/performances or bring my experiences up to them as an example. I only use my running, athletic or triathlon successes or medical experiences with athletes/performers and performance to impart wisdom to kids who are actively seeking and forthcoming. I have never tried to force those ideas and experiences on them.

As a student of athletics I have listened to generations of athletes stretching back to the late 20s and have heard them talk about "back in the day" and laughed at those that hold on to the past and admired those who look at the present and future. " Open minds and shut mouths" was an addage Pete Brewster used when talking about players who headed into coaching....one that I have passed on to many young aspiring coaches including my own progeny.

All in all I love discussion that is civil and informative as we all benefit from shared ideas and information. Acknowledging that kids today see things differently as well as the fact that branding is huge to a recruit is simply accepting what is real whether you and I agree with it or not. If sharing that knowledge gets you on the internets looking for donations and things to critique I can shut it down. THis is the third time here on BA that you have done this. I was gone from here for over a year at one point, I have plenty of other interests between HS ball, motorcycles, healthcare, music and a couple of other forums to pursue. Really don't need this scrutiny from you and truth be known, would make a few folks in admin and coaching happier if I was not here... While I respect your opines and input I have done nothing to incite your ire and acknowledge that in no way do I have any of the background and history in OHIO athletics that you and Alan do ... now that you have pissed on this fire hydrant and marked your spot Have at it.... I'm out



never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer.....

The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game

Back to Top
  
BBFan
General User

Member Since: 12/25/2015
Post Count: 21

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/27/2016 7:53:55 PM 
+1 Like!
Back to Top
  
OUVan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/28/2016 9:25:47 AM 
cc-cat wrote:
The point being made is that these kids are starting to make their making their choice heavily influenced by the kicks they wear. Not the coach, not the education, not the facilities, not the location, not the style of play, etc.

The directing of kids to schools with the "right" shoe deal is not because they "like" the shoe (let's not be naive)), but rather because their AAU coach (and team) is sponsored by the shoe company, and will get a kickback if they direct their players to the "right" school. Yet another example who is ruling the roost


So what I'd like to know is how do these AAU coaches end up having so much sway with the kids? I love my son's AAU coach but I can't imagine him having the ability to direct where my son's going to end up going. He's obviously going to be able to offer advice but that's all it would be.
Back to Top
  
bobcatsquared
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,044

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/28/2016 11:50:29 AM 
^$$$$$$$^
Back to Top
  
OUVan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/28/2016 12:35:21 PM 
bobcatsquared wrote:
^$$$$$$$^


But the money wouldn't be coming from the AAU coach would it?
Back to Top
  
cc-cat
General User

Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 3,822

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/28/2016 12:59:40 PM 
OUVan wrote:
bobcatsquared wrote:
^$$$$$$$^


But the money wouldn't be coming from the AAU coach would it?


Not from him - to him. From shoe companies (and colleges). I know of a guy here in the Carolinas whose primary source of income is payola for directing his players to specific coaches/schools. Coaches have always had a huge impact on where a player gets directed (read Game Changer re: Charlie Scott), the more the money gets involved, the more impact - especially with kids that do not have the strong, stable family structure that your son has.

It is interesting, I was reading back through the thread re: Tariq Owens and his departure from Ohio (heavily influenced by his AAU coach - led to a Twitter tiff between the coach and Bobcat Love). At issue was whether we should let Owens out of his LOI. General take was that the kid commits to the school, not the coach - appears they are now starting by considering the shoe partner. Not because of an allegiance to a "brand" or podiatry fit, but because. as always, one must follow the money.
Back to Top
  
OUVan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/28/2016 1:19:04 PM 
cc-cat wrote:
OUVan wrote:
bobcatsquared wrote:
^$$$$$$$^


But the money wouldn't be coming from the AAU coach would it?


Not from him - to him. From shoe companies (and colleges). I know of a guy here in the Carolinas whose primary source of income is payola for directing his players to specific coaches/schools. Coaches have always had a huge impact on where a player gets directed (read Game Changer re: Charlie Scott), the more the money gets involved, the more impact - especially with kids that do not have the strong, stable family structure that your son has.

It is interesting, I was reading back through the thread re: Tariq Owens and his departure from Ohio (heavily influenced by his AAU coach - led to a Twitter tiff between the coach and Bobcat Love). At issue was whether we should let Owens out of his LOI. General take was that the kid commits to the school, not the coach - appears they are now starting by considering the shoe partner. Not because of an allegiance to a "brand" or podiatry fit, but because. as always, one must follow the money.



I understand that part but my point is why would my son's AAU coach have such a big influence over where my son decides to go? He can steer all he wants but ultimately I'm going to have a bigger influence over where he chooses than his coach. That might be different in a household where a coach plays a larger role in his life.

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/28/2016 4:05:16 PM 
Your last thought probably hit the nail on the head, Van.

Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,024

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/28/2016 5:29:30 PM 
Monroe Slavin wrote:
Your last thought probably hit the nail on the head, Van.



Bingo! High school coaches and programs are very highly regulated. AAU, not so much.
Back to Top
  
Donuts
General User

Member Since: 9/22/2010
Post Count: 715

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/29/2016 1:26:40 PM 
I'm a Nike guy myself, but anyone who thinks Adidas is looked down upon is kidding themselves. Their brand is as strong as it has been in years. Nike is still king when just looking at basketball shoes, but Adidas is closing the gap. Boost is the hottest tech in shoes right now on and off court.
Back to Top
  
OU_Country
General User



Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,320

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/29/2016 4:29:06 PM 
Recovering Journalist wrote:
SBH wrote:


Ah yes, the "smackdown" from the all-knowing expert on basketball. I never indicated the players should be using outdated foot gear. Can you argue that when "student athletes" are choosing schools based on apparel brand, there's something wrong with the picture? And I retain my right to voice my opinion, Borna. It comes with paying for my tickets and writing checks to the program. Try either one for a change, "y'all."



You specifically named the shoe, and implied that in your day, dagnabbit, Chucks and hand-me-down uniforms were good enough. Comfortable and good looking clothes -- and brands -- matter to most athletes. Borna is just supplying a dose of reality. You don't have to like it. He knows a lot more about this kind of stuff than I do, and I am happy to get his insight on here.



+1. I always enjoy talking hoops and other stories over a soda with Borna & family, along with others I've met as a result of this board. Sometimes I come away learning something new. I'm a smarter basketball fan as a consequence.


Adding a thought, while we're all allowed to voice our opinions, and this is truly an opinion forum, the act of buying tickets and writing checks to the program really don't "entitle" any of us to our opinion.
Back to Top
  
OU_Country
General User



Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,320

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/29/2016 4:33:24 PM 
Recovering Journalist wrote:
AudioCat'13 wrote:


So if there's a switch I'm assuming it's for all sports? Or is it just a basketball only deal?


The Russell deal was for all sports. Seems safe to assume a change would be as well.

http://www.ohiobobcats.com/genrel/082812aad.html

Edit: Since it did cover all sports, I can only imagine that athletes on teams like soccer, volleyball and track and field, where Russell has extremely limited options and very little brand recognition, are very excited for Adidas.



Speaking as a fan, former player and youth coach, I have to assume that the ladies soccer team will be thrilled with the switch to Adidas assuming it's all encompassing for every sport. Adidas is among the top of the line in football gear world wide.
Back to Top
  
BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 9,486

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: No more Russell Athletic?
   Posted: 11/29/2016 5:50:51 PM 
OU_Country wrote:
Recovering Journalist wrote:
AudioCat'13 wrote:


So if there's a switch I'm assuming it's for all sports? Or is it just a basketball only deal?


The Russell deal was for all sports. Seems safe to assume a change would be as well.

http://www.ohiobobcats.com/genrel/082812aad.html

Edit: Since it did cover all sports, I can only imagine that athletes on teams like soccer, volleyball and track and field, where Russell has extremely limited options and very little brand recognition, are very excited for Adidas.



Speaking as a fan, former player and youth coach, I have to assume that the ladies soccer team will be thrilled with the switch to Adidas assuming it's all encompassing for every sport. Adidas is among the top of the line in football gear world wide.


Soccer wore Adidas in the past, Russell does not make shoes, so they were free to wear whatever footware they wanted. Interestingly they ditched Adidas for UA this past season.

Last Edited: 11/29/2016 5:51:33 PM by BillyTheCat
Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  26 - 50  of 65 Posts
Jump to Page:  < Previous    1 | 2 | 3    Next >
View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             



WHO'S ONLINE
There are 88 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com
87 Guests
1 Registered User:
 Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
There are no other users looking at this page.




Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties