BobcatAttack.com - For Fans of Ohio University Sports

Welcome Guest!
Create an Account

site search

where to watch

about us

advertise with us

help

BobcatAttack.com Message Board

Ohio Basketball

Topic: RE: Wadly granted release

Topic: RE: Wadly granted release

Author

Message

Speaker of Truth
General User

Member Since: 1/26/2011
Post Count: 441

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/19/2016 9:58:59 PM

bornacatfan wrote:

the123kid wrote:

Kenny might've needed a year to mature, I can't argue that. I have no problem with a Coach kicking a player off a team, but if he does so, there is no reason a player should have to sit out.

The rules are extremely stacked against the athletes, they have no right or say in anything that affects them. Rules are made by the people who are profiting the most.

Give me some real examples of rules being stacked against athletes. I am not following that.

Seems to me both parties have a leg up on each other. When you are basing your professional life on the actions and whims of 18 to 22 year olds you both have a situation where you depend on each other for success. How is the balance totally tipped in the favor of the institution or coach?. How does that compare to 20 30 years ago or have we reconsidered how we view coach/player relations and athlete/institutional responsibilities?

Obviously, the coaches who are like Bobby Knight or the situation at Rutgers have been unacceptable in this day and generation but do we have a situation brewing where the athletes are their own agents and run the program?

How is it there such and obvious disparity where the consensus is that the rules are "extremely" stacked against the athletes and what do you base your personal experiences non anecdotal judgements on?

Borna, The Athletes have no voting power in the rules that they must follow. Every other professional sports league in the world, the athletes have a say. A few examples: Transfer Rules, compensation, practice requirements, game travel. If these are student athletes and it is about developing them as students first, then make it about that. My issue is that the NCAA wants it both ways. They want to claim it is about the students and then go around and make billions.

To be clear, I am discussing the big two sports: Men's Hoops and Football.

Speaker of Truth
General User

Member Since: 1/26/2011
Post Count: 441

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/19/2016 10:01:37 PM

OUVan wrote:

the123kid wrote:

Just make a rule that schools can't recruit other players.

That rule is already in place but that didn't stop a big school from trying to get DJ to transfer after his freshman season. Relying on a rule not to be broken is ridiculous.

Sorry but without having to sit out there would be teams fielding almost all walk-on teams. I really don't see the problem with making them sit out a year. They don't lose a year of eligibility unless they transfer more than once.

OUVan, what you are saying is that because coaches won't follow the rules, we need to punish the players....that's pretty backwards thinking. You're treating these students like they are there purely for your enjoyment as a fan, it's actually pretty sad.

Jeff McKinney
Moderator

Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,047

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/19/2016 10:33:36 PM

Agree with the Van on this.

OUVan
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/20/2016 9:42:06 AM

the123kid wrote:

Is it sad? The schools, who they committed to, are living up to their end of the bargain. They are getting their education paid for and still are able to play basketball. Sorry, don't see the sadness.

cc-cat
General User

Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 3,821

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/20/2016 9:53:50 AM

Let's make scholarships for four years and not "renewable" on a yearly basis and start other discussions from there.

bornacatfan
General User

Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,706

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/20/2016 9:57:57 AM

the123kid wrote:

Borna, The Athletes have no voting power in the rules that they must follow. Every other PROFESSIONAL sports league in the world, the athletes have a say.

well you are absolutely right about that.

Just Curious. Do you have a say in the rules of your profession? I can be active in my professional society but the rules of Insurance, Medicare, OSHA, IRS...I don't really have a choice. Pretty much quid pro quo...I get to eat and survive if I follow the rules....as outdated and unfair as some of them are. WOnder why professional athletes get to mandate ....

never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer.....

The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game

GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 6,920

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/20/2016 11:14:47 AM

cc-cat wrote:

Let's make scholarships for four years and not "renewable" on a yearly basis and start other discussions from there.

That's an interesting scenario simply because it more or less turns into a 4-year contract and not a scholarship. Legalities of that would cause a lot of headaches.

Bobcatbob
General User

Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Coolville, OH
Post Count: 1,341

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/20/2016 2:30:14 PM

bornacatfan wrote:

the123kid wrote:

Borna, The Athletes have no voting power in the rules that they must follow. Every other PROFESSIONAL sports league in the world, the athletes have a say.

I believe that the only way this is happening anywhere is through collective bargaining and/or litigation. The short-lived Northwestern union organization is proof it's not happening on campus any time soon.

Missouri had some success with a "labor" action, which led to this interesting proposal in the Missouri House (later withdrawn).

http://www.stltoday.com/news/legislation-targets-mizzou-f...

cc-cat
General User

Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 3,821

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/20/2016 3:33:52 PM

GoCats105 wrote:

cc-cat wrote:

Let's make scholarships for four years and not "renewable" on a yearly basis and start other discussions from there.

That's an interesting scenario simply because it more or less turns into a 4-year contract and not a scholarship. Legalities of that would cause a lot of headaches.

Actually it is already and option - but many schools do not.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/jon-solom...

Not sure why not? Would think it could be a recruiting tool.

bornacatfan
General User

Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,706

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/20/2016 4:25:58 PM

cc-cat wrote:

GoCats105 wrote:

cc-cat wrote:

Let's make scholarships for four years and not "renewable" on a yearly basis and start other discussions from there.

That's an interesting scenario simply because it more or less turns into a 4-year contract and not a scholarship. Legalities of that would cause a lot of headaches.

Actually it is already and option - but many schools do not.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/jon-solom...

Not sure why not? Would think it could be a recruiting tool.

That is a must read article for folks who want to understand how we got here. Good posting.

Not sure but I think I remember a couple of conferences were passing mandates that they would all be giving 4 year rides.

Speaker of Truth
General User

Member Since: 1/26/2011
Post Count: 441

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/20/2016 11:38:57 PM

bornacatfan wrote:

the123kid wrote:

Borna, The Athletes have no voting power in the rules that they must follow. Every other PROFESSIONAL sports league in the world, the athletes have a say.

No real regulations, but I see your point. I was never a big fan of "Well Scenario A isn't fair so Scenerio B should just put up with it". I like to look at it as it's own scenario.

Eagle66
General User

Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 1,329

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/21/2016 6:43:47 PM

Sorry to pull this back around to the original topic... But Wadley might not be leaving after all...

Per Jeff Goodman - Wadly Mompremier has opted not to transfer and remain at Ohio U, sources told ESPN. No one�s weekend just got as good as Saul Phillips�.

https://twitter.com/goodmanespn/status/723257930812932096

Arkley said a return is probable but not a done deal.

http://www.athensmessenger.com/sports/ohiouniversity/pote...

bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
General User

Member Since: 12/1/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 1,925

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/21/2016 10:31:44 PM

Eagle66 wrote:

Didn't see this reply when I posted the news in it's own thread, but given the seemingly fluid nature of this decision I think it makes the most sense to stay in this thread.

Interesting that Arkley makes it seem like it is not a done deal one way or the other, but Wadly did retweet Goodman's tweet that he was back.

Chicken George
General User

Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 762

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/21/2016 11:13:27 PM

Not sure my thoughts are kosher or not, but unless SP thinks 1 of the available scholarships will go unused and he might as well allow Wadley to take it for one year,or he foresees Wadley serving a purpose such as the remote possibility Tony leaves for Europe and he'd be needed, I don't give him the scholarship back. If SP has another quality recruit that he feels he's going to sign, or an impact transfer that would serve a greater purpose--I'd use the "your lack decision making doesn't constitute an emergency on my behalf" line of reasoning. Once again, I'm note sure how this would sit, but if SP has made alternative plans he feels good about at this crucial juncture in the recruiting process, especially if the roster will utilize Wadley as little as it did this past year, I move on. Those are my initial thoughts.

UpSan Bobcat
General User

Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,792

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/22/2016 9:18:58 AM

Chicken George wrote:

Kind of reading between the lines, but it sounds like that probably is exactly the case. If they mutually agree it'd be a good situation for him to stay, then he still might do so.

Dexcat
General User

Member Since: 11/6/2013
Post Count: 111

Status: Offline

RE: Wadly granted release

Posted: 4/22/2016 11:32:52 AM

Chicken George wrote:

I realize Saul has a system for basketball, but I don't think he views his players as assets or tools to best fit. I think he'll treat Wadley like a person and is probably trying to help Wadley find the best scenario possible. If that is to play here (albeit limited with Dougie and Tony), but he can finish his degree in time then that's the move he'll make and give him a scholarship regardless of recruiting.

Showing Replies:	51 - 66 of 66 Posts
Jump to Page:	< Previous 1 \| 2 \| 3

View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics

There are 209 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com

209 Guests
0 Registered Users

There are no other users looking at this page.