BobcatAttack.com - For Fans of Ohio University Sports

Welcome Guest!
Create an Account

site search

about us

advertise with us

help

BobcatAttack.com Message Board

Ohio Football

Topic: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Topic: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Author

Message

Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline

O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 8:35:52 AM

O-Lin Grades vs. Buffalo

Name                       Plays     Points    Grade Pancakes Decleaters Knockdowns

John Prior                             34              57          1.67              3                       0                3

Jon Lechner                          49               92         1.87              4                       0               4

Mike Lucas                            74               143          1.93              4                       0              4

Ryan McGrath                        51                94           1.84             5                       0              5

Mike McQueen                      40                 71           1.77              0                      0                0

Lucas Powell                          74           141          1.90         2                        0               2

Troy Watson                         23                 38           1.65             0                      0                 0

Durraell Wood                       25               45           1.90              0                      0                 0

Last Edited: 11/10/2013 8:39:41 AM by Bcat2

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 8:40:36 AM

Perhaps Mr. Prior was not yet 100%

Youngsters; Lucas, Powell, Wood showed up well.

How does Johnson getting to probable impact this group? Lechner has played tackle.

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 8:51:58 AM

The center of the line (lucas, powell, lechner) graded ok, but I agree - clearly Prior isn't 100%, and McQueen has room for improvement. That's the most important position, too, as it protects TT's blindside. TT is going to perform a lot better if he isn't having to keep looking over his shoulder.The other tackle wasn't much better. I don't think McGrath is 100%, either, and Watson also has room for improvement.

As I said in the other thread, the intentional grounding resulted when both tackles were beaten on the same play.

To get the running game going, we'll also need to see a lot more pancakes/decleaters all across the front. They are really missing Herman in that regard.

Last Edited: 11/10/2013 8:56:06 AM by L.C.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 1:24:42 PM

Missing Herman, indeed.

Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!

DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 5:39:34 PM

Comparing grades by position this year (nine games) to last year (first ten games - that's all the data i have). The numbers for pancakes and decleaters are averages per game.:

              This year                      Last year                  Difference
       Grade Pancakes Decleaters    Grade Pancakes Decleaters    Grade Pcake Declt
LT      1.84 2.8    1.1        1.85    4.9 2.9         -.01 -2.1    -1.8
LG      1.83    3.5       .8         1.86    8.3    .5         -.03   -4.8     +.3
C       1.86 5.8       .2         1.91    8.6    .3         -.05   -2.8     -.1
RG      1.85    4.8       .7         1.89   10.5    .8         -.04   -5.7     -.1
RT      1.81 4.4       .4         1.90    7.8 2.0         -.09   -3.4    -1.6
Total   1.84   21.3    3.2         1.88   40.1       6.5         -.04 -18.8    -3.3

Note that these aren't totally accurate as players change position sometimes, so I divided their pancakes, etc, between the two positions. There is a huge difference in pancakes. Grades are basically down in all areas - this offensive line isn't as good as last year, clearly. OK, so how about even earlier years? My data isn't complete, but I gave it a shot:

       Grade Pncks   Declt Rush Avg/play Sacks Against Avg Off/Play   Tot Off/Game
2013    1.84 21.3    3.2        3.9            9              5.9           406.7
2012    1.88   40.1    6.5        4.4           27              5.8           444.8
2011    1.86   30.0    6.0        4.6           23              6.1           446.4
2010    1.82 23.1    3.2        4.3           22              5.5           326.1
2009    1.81 17.7    5.4        3.4         29              5.1           348.5
2008    1.75   16.0    7.8        3.9 23          5.6           361.4
2007    1.70 22.7    8.7        3.8           26              5.3           362.8
2006    1.67 23.5   13.7        3.9           20              4.5           276.6
2005    1.67   20.7   15.5        4.5           19            4.8           303.0
2004       no data                2.9       52              5.0           340.0

The number of pancakes most years has been about 20 a game, but last year was unusually high. The number of decleaters has been steadily dropping, but the overall grade has been steadily rising (grade inflation??). I wondered if that reflected a shift from a passing attack to a running one. The data shows that Ohio hasn't changed the run/pass mix all that much over the years, though rushing attempts are down somewhat this year.

       #Rush Plays #Pass Plays   %Rushing    Sacks/pass attempts
2013     333          289            53.5%            3.1%
2012     596          402            59.7%            6.7%
2011     599          428            58.3%            5.4%
2010     496          272            64.6%            8.1%
2009     455          402            53.1%            7.2%
2008   392          386            50.4%            6.0%
2007     472          344            57.8%            7.6%
2006     525          331            61.3%            6.0%
2005     427          264            61.8%            7.2%
2004     340          346            49.6%           15.0%

Conclusions:
On the whole the data shows that this offensive line is not as good as last year, which I think we all knew, but neither is it horrible. This year's line has done a particularly good job of not giving up sacks, but part of that is TT's experience, I think, in knowing when to throw it away. The average gain per rushing attempt is down a lot from the last couple years, but at 3.9 a carry it's actually better now than in most of the years 2005-2009, and dramatically better than under Knorr.

Yes, I'd like to see the running game better, but it isn't as bad as I thought. I guess I'm spoiled by the last couple years, too. Note, though, that the average gain per offensive play is actually up slightly from last year, and at the 2d highest level under Solich, so it isn't all bad.

Last Edited: 11/10/2013 5:43:42 PM by L.C.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 6:00:04 PM

L.C. wrote:

This is me bowing reverently to L.C..

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 6:28:49 PM

One more stat I thought of to check--- avg carry by leading RB's by year: That should reflect the effectiveness of the core "up the middle" attack. I also computed what percentage of the offensive plays are handoffs/pitches to the RB.
    RB Carries Yds   Avg/Carry Pct of Off Plays     Who?
2004   222      992      4.5        32.4%      (McRae 3.9, Roush 5.4)
2005 253     1381      5.5        36.6%        (McRae 5.5, Owens 5.2)
2006   301     1413      4.7        35.2%        (McRae 4.9, Owens 3.7)
2007   294     1434      4.9        36.0%        (McRae 4.9)
2008   248     1153      4.6    31.9%        (Garrett 4.5, Harden 5.2, Davidson 3.9)
2009   275     1118      4.1        32.1%        (Garrett 4.2, Davidson 3.9, Harden 3.9)
2010   189      799      4.2        24.6%        (Davidson 3.9, Harden 4.8)
2011   446     2106      4.7        43.4%        (Harden 5.3, Blankenship 5.0, Boykin 4.1)
2012   420     2244      5.3        42.1%        (Blankenship 5.1, Boykin 6.0, Patterson 5.7)
2013   259     1136      4.4        41.6%        (Blankenship 4.5, Boykin 3.8, Patterson 6.1)

I found a few things here interesting:
1. First of all, the average per carry was higher in 2005 (a bad year), than in 2006 - a good year.
2. The average per carry was consistently higher with McRae than in any year that followed, except for 2012, a stat that I don't find surprising at all. He was one heck of a back.
3. I see that RB carries as a percentage of all plays declined significantly for the next few years after he left, which wasn't surprising considering they weren't as effective.
4. The last three years, under TT, and with the pistol offense, RB carries as a percentage of plays rose significantly from when they ran the power I, a stat I wasn't expecting.
5. Yards per carry this year are the 3rd lowest in the last 10 years, but the number of times it is being used is the 3rd highest. Thus, there is some support for the premise that they either need to find a fix to make it work better, or they could diversify the offense away from it somewhat.

Last Edited: 11/10/2013 6:29:46 PM by L.C.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 6:51:51 PM

Bcat2 wrote:

This is me bowing reverently to L.C..

Thanks - most of the time I just collect data, and don't have time to look at it. With the mid-week games, I could look at it over the weekend this time, plus I was curious about a lot of things.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 8:49:13 PM

L.C. wrote:

Bcat2 wrote:

This is me bowing reverently to L.C..

Thanks - most of the time I just collect data, and don't have time to look at it. With the mid-week games, I could look at it over the weekend this time, plus I was curious about a lot of things.

The Buffalo grades have me curious about the future. Will McQueen, Lucas, Powell, Wood and Watson be better than Prior. Lechner, Allen, Herman and McGrath?

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,391

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 8:55:22 PM

O-Line grades are only part of the equation! Is the back hitting the hole, making the proper read. Is the QB making the right reads, are the WR running the right routes? Sharp routes? Back picking up the right calls, and executing the blocks? It all starts up front, but is that the Bennington and the end?

Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 9:22:51 PM

L.C.--You are enormous.

One thing I saw about the Beefs line that i admired is that they were in unison. I don't know what that play is that they all block one way but they sure ripped us up on it. During the past few years it seemed as if we were creating that kind of O-line action--holes to run thru. Not this year.

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 9:28:36 PM

BillyTheCat wrote:

O-Line grades are only part of the equation!...

Obviously that's true. Note that McRea consistently got more per carry than Owens, and Harden got more per carry than Davidson, and those comparisons were direct - the same offensive line blocking for McRea and Owens, and the same line blocking for Harden and Davidson, and Garrett better than both.

Last Edited: 11/10/2013 9:37:41 PM by L.C.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,391

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 9:31:29 PM

L.C. wrote:

BillyTheCat wrote:

O-Line grades are only part of the equation!...

O-Line is not only ones blocking, that edge block or the POA is more important on many runs.

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/10/2013 9:39:16 PM

True, the TE's are blocking, too, as are the WR and the fullbacks (if any).

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

Casper71
General User

Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,090

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/12/2013 9:54:08 AM

Hard to figure grades like that as poor as our run gme was. Then, again, is 1.86 good? I wonder how Buffs rated?

oucs 1986
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Mason, OH
Post Count: 251

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/12/2013 11:39:05 AM

Forgive my ignorance, please.

I thought grades for O-Linemen were on a -2 to 2 scale.

You did well: get a 2
You messed up: get a -2
You did as expected: 0

These grades seem high to me, but that might be because I'm looking at grades incorrectly.

Please educate me.

-john

Go Bobcats!

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/12/2013 1:18:52 PM

As I understand, 2 is a completed block, 0 is failed. It is also possible to get a 1 (kinda blocked?). Pancakes and decleaters are exceptional blocks where you take the defender to the ground, or knock him down. They also used to give us information on important things like penalties, sacks, and QB pressures, which are the negatives. I'm not sure why they don't give us that information anymore, but it stopped appearing after the Miami game last year. Without it, you can't really get a complete picture because you have only the positives, and not the negatives.

The odd thing is that the offensive line grades have trended higher in recent years, and I don't have a good feel for why that is. Partly I think it was the switch to zone blocking, and partly it is more pocket passing, but there may also be some grade inflation at work, I don't know. Certainly we don't see a massive improvement in the running game related to the higher grades, though we do see less sacks, but that probably also due to TT's experience.

I do a combo-score that factors in the grade, the pancakes, and the decleaters, and it seems to correlate well to winning or losing.. When the combo score is over 4.1, the Bobcats rarely lose, and when it is under 4.0, they rarely win. There is also a strong correlation between my combo score and the average yds/carry by running backs. If you don't want to use my combo score, I'd say Pancakes correlates best to avg carry, far better than the grade itself.

Here are some game by game numbers:

            Grade   Pancakes Decleaters My combo score RB Avg/Carry
Louisville   1.81      16         1            4.02     3.2
NTSU         1.83 33 4        4.11           5.4
Marshall     1.82       9         3            3.96 1.8
Peay       1.86      29         6            4.11       5.8
Akron        1.78      20         2            4.02       4.1
CMU          1.86      23         8            4.07       3.6
EMU          1.82      18         1            4.02 4.3
Miami        1.91      26         4            4.10       6.4
Buffalo      1.84      18         0            4.02 4.2

The highest scores I have recorded for my combo score were by Herman, last year, at 4.23, and Carlotta last year at 4.20. Lechner is running those kind of numbers this year, too, when he has been able to play. Since players almost always go up from one year to the next (for example, Herman scored 4.02, 4.06, 4.12, 4.23 in his four years, and Carlotta scored 3.98, 4.02, 4.08, 4.20), the most impressive numbers I see this year are Lucas at 4.08, Wood at 4.05, and Powell at 4.08, which are truly exceptional numbers for two Freshmen and a Sophomore. The future looks very bright - those guys will be a force to reckon with when they are Juniors and Seniors.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

Casper71
General User

Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,090

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/12/2013 11:09:03 PM

I'm sure we will hear how well the O-line graded out vs BG too.

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/16/2013 8:08:04 PM

Casper71 wrote:

I'm sure we will hear how well the O-line graded out vs BG too.

Mmhmm, and it was not pretty. Avg score was a bit under 1.77, lowest since the NTSU game in 2009. My adjusted score was 3.92, lowest since Toledo in 2010. There were a grand total of 6 pancakes (4 by Lechner), and no decleaters, and the only other game that low since my records started was Wyoming in 2008.

Were there any bright spots at all? Well, Lechner had a passable score, though not one of his better games, and while Johnson did not return, Mark Smith did return, and scored a perfect 2.0 in his short stint in the game (13 plays) at center, behind Powell. He played well at LG in 2010-2011, but redshirted last year, and was hurt in fall camp this year. I suppose another bright spot is that Freshmen-Sophomores continue to gain experience, which bodes well for a couple years down the road. Lucas, Watson, Powell, McQueen, and Everhart all played and had a learning experience.

Last Edited: 11/16/2013 8:20:39 PM by L.C.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/17/2013 12:40:53 PM

That's great news about MARK SMITH.

I believe that he played significantly as a freshmen and, then, had to bide his time on the sideline for various reasons. Good for him. Thanks for sticking with, young man!

OhioCatFan
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,743

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/18/2013 6:02:21 PM

L.C. wrote:

. . .
5. Yards per carry this year are the 3rd lowest in the last 10 years, but the number of times it is being used is the 3rd highest. . . .

I'm not a very good Xs and Os type of guy, but the first thing that came to mind here is that this represents way too many "Beau's up the middle." Is that a reasonable hypothesis based on this data?

The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/18/2013 8:25:30 PM

When the line grades are high, the Offensive Coordinator in a genius and the QB and RB are great, because everything works. When they are low, they are all goats, because nothing works. On a rare game, like EMU, where the line grades are relatively low, but the QB has career numbers, then you know that the QB did indeed have an awesome game.

When the line can't made room, if you try run, you won't get much. If you try to pass, you get a few sacks, fumbles, picks and balls thrown away, mixed in with the plays that work. Pick your poison. Me, I'd probably err on the side of more runs, and hope to wear them down a little. You can mix in roll outs or screen passes to help a little, but really there aren't a lot of great choices.

I hope the O-line comes out against Kent with a chip on their shoulder, and knock Kent off the line.

Last Edited: 11/18/2013 8:28:39 PM by L.C.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

OhioCatFan
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,743

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/18/2013 11:50:23 PM

L.C., I understand what you are saying, but "Beau up the middle" has seldom yielded more than a yard or two at best. Boykin up the middle has done a little bit better on occasion. It would seem to me that an OC worth his salt would not call these very much and would instruct TT to be very careful to not audible into this play unless he's very sure of success. I would assume that TT has a wide variety of plays he can audible, but it seems we don't see more than two or three with "up the middle" seemingly the almost default choice. I did notice one interesting phenomenon in I believe two different games where after several Boykins up the middle that when Beau came back in he was able to get greater yardage. It's kind of like Boykin softened up their defense to the point that Beau did better with the up-the-middle play. Isn't that the kind of tendency that an OC should notice? I'm asking these questions because I truly wonder about them. I don't pretend to be much of an expert in this area.

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,493

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/19/2013 12:47:30 AM

Well, as regards specific play calls, I can't comment. I miss the days of the old, unreliable MAC-Access, when I got to watch every game. This year the only games I have gotten to actually see were EMU and Buffalo. In both games I thought I saw pretty diverse play calls, albeit not always successful. Against Buffalo I was mostly watching the line play, which was very intense and hard hitting on both sides, and so I can't really comment on the play selection at all.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

RE: O Line Grades vs Buffalo

Posted: 11/19/2013 1:06:23 AM

I've seen every game. Our play-calling is about the same every game. I've too oft noted the type of variety we can bring..to mention again would even bore me.

The refusal (player? coaching?) to run the off-tackle read option which we've used to such great effect in prior years is very confounding.

The line isn't opening huge holes. But we're not making opposing defenses defend much--which might create holes by way of not allowing defenses to pack the middle. Watch us a time or two and you've seen our entire repertoire. We don't do nothin' new.

Showing Replies:	1 - 25 of 27 Posts
Jump to Page:	1 \| 2 Next >

View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics

There are 204 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com

201 Guests
3 Registered Users:
	Victory, Cleveburg Bri, Flat Tire

There are no other users looking at this page.