Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over

Topic:  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
Author
Message
rpbobcat
General User

Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,520

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/26/2021 3:09:38 PM 
mf279801 wrote:


Pretty sure it will be either 14-0 or 13-1(TAMU) for both Texas and Oklahoma’s SEC membership. Once it’s clear they have the votes to get in, everyone will vote yes for it.




Just heard a sports blurb on the radio.

Its an anonymous source, but they said its a done deal,13-1 with
A&M voting no.



Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,025

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/26/2021 6:13:10 PM 
I could see this eventually working out to 4 16 team conferences for a 64 team division and then everyone else in a lower division.
Back to Top
  
DXer
General User

Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Mobile, AL
Post Count: 135

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/26/2021 7:20:32 PM 
If it ends up with 4 conferences, then that would be perfect for me. Keep the playoffs at four teams - the four conference champions. No polls, no politics. Just the four teams who won their way in on the field.
Back to Top
  
colobobcat66
General User

Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,164

Status: Online

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/26/2021 7:27:31 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
I could see this eventually working out to 4 16 team conferences for a 64 team division and then everyone else in a lower division.


Well there’s 65 teams (including ND) in the P-5 now so that just shuffles the teams with not much change in the teams involved. So which current P-5 team gets left out or do some current G-5 teams (Houston, BYU, Boise, Cincy, Memphis, CF) make it and replace more current P-5 teams (Vanderbilt, TCU, Wake Forrest )?
Back to Top
  
Scott Woods
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: On the banks of the Ohio, OH
Post Count: 226

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/26/2021 9:42:03 PM 
DXer wrote:
If it ends up with 4 conferences, then that would be perfect for me. Keep the playoffs at four teams - the four conference champions. No polls, no politics. Just the four teams who won their way in on the field.


Like the time Penn State was the Big 10 conference champ, but Ohio State went to the "playoffs"?


Religion morality and knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.

So enter that daily thou mayest grow in knowledge wisdom and love. So depart that daily thou mayest better serve thy fellowmen thy country and thy God.

Back to Top
  
DXer
General User

Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Mobile, AL
Post Count: 135

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 1:30:34 AM 
Precisely !!!
Back to Top
  
cc-cat
General User

Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 3,829

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 11:02:31 AM 
colobobcat66 wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
I could see this eventually working out to 4 16 team conferences for a 64 team division and then everyone else in a lower division.


Well there’s 65 teams (including ND) in the P-5 now so that just shuffles the teams with not much change in the teams involved. So which current P-5 team gets left out or do some current G-5 teams (Houston, BYU, Boise, Cincy, Memphis, CF) make it and replace more current P-5 teams (Vanderbilt, TCU, Wake Forrest )?


Army, Navy, and Air Force will want in and Congress will (in public and behind the scenes) make it happen.
Back to Top
  
SVAC83
General User

Member Since: 10/1/2019
Post Count: 143

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 11:30:17 AM 
this is why i think you need to either think about 5 16 team leagues or 4 20 team leagues. because when you break down all the teams and influences that your not going to get down to 64 but there will be a break in next 10 years and it will be 80 teams or less

unless you go totally the other way and you dwindle it down to 48 teams.

Last Edited: 7/27/2021 11:31:29 AM by SVAC83

Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 6,940

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 1:36:23 PM 
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?
Back to Top
  
cc-cat
General User

Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 3,829

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 1:51:46 PM 
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.
Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 6,940

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 2:16:40 PM 
cc-cat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.


The former. Of course they would join the super.

Last Edited: 7/27/2021 2:17:00 PM by GoCats105

Back to Top
  
The Optimist
General User



Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,555

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 4:43:30 PM 
GoCats105 wrote:
cc-cat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.


The former. Of course they would join the super.


It depends who is staying in the "new" Big 12. Maybe I'm jaded by considering basketball, but from a basketball perspective I think that'd be an extremely attractive league for Cincinnati and "not bad" for football.


I've seen crazier things happen.

Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 6,940

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 5:05:56 PM 
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
cc-cat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.


The former. Of course they would join the super.


It depends who is staying in the "new" Big 12. Maybe I'm jaded by considering basketball, but from a basketball perspective I think that'd be an extremely attractive league for Cincinnati and "not bad" for football.


Unfortunately basketball has never been the driver in a lot of these decisions. You can't do much better than Kansas, TxTech, OkSt and Baylor in that regard.

And I'm afraid they'll run into the same issues that WVU has with the league in regards to travel. But if a few other local schools were added maybe it won't be so bad.
Back to Top
  
BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 9,512

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 10:31:17 PM 
rpbobcat wrote:
mf279801 wrote:


Pretty sure it will be either 14-0 or 13-1(TAMU) for both Texas and Oklahoma’s SEC membership. Once it’s clear they have the votes to get in, everyone will vote yes for it.




Just heard a sports blurb on the radio.

Its an anonymous source, but they said its a done deal,13-1 with
A&M voting no.





A&M released a statement today that they would support Texas.
Back to Top
  
The Optimist
General User



Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,555

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 11:01:15 PM 
GoCats105 wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
cc-cat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.


The former. Of course they would join the super.


It depends who is staying in the "new" Big 12. Maybe I'm jaded by considering basketball, but from a basketball perspective I think that'd be an extremely attractive league for Cincinnati and "not bad" for football.


Unfortunately basketball has never been the driver in a lot of these decisions. You can't do much better than Kansas, TxTech, OkSt and Baylor in that regard.

And I'm afraid they'll run into the same issues that WVU has with the league in regards to travel. But if a few other local schools were added maybe it won't be so bad.


Here is my Super-Optimist vision to bail on the MAC:

East
UConn
Buffalo
UMass
Temple
WVU
Ohio
Louisville
Cincy

West
Memphis
Tulane
SMU
Houston
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Kansas
Kansas State

Why would anyone want the Athens TV market? They wouldn’t. Most of our alumni are in Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati. It’s time to stop pretending our TV market is Athens and Nelsonville and acknowledge we have some Bobcat fans who would prefer to watch the Bobcats over the Buckeyes around the rest of the state.


I've seen crazier things happen.

Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,016

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/27/2021 11:35:05 PM 
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
cc-cat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.


The former. Of course they would join the super.


It depends who is staying in the "new" Big 12. Maybe I'm jaded by considering basketball, but from a basketball perspective I think that'd be an extremely attractive league for Cincinnati and "not bad" for football.


Unfortunately basketball has never been the driver in a lot of these decisions. You can't do much better than Kansas, TxTech, OkSt and Baylor in that regard.

And I'm afraid they'll run into the same issues that WVU has with the league in regards to travel. But if a few other local schools were added maybe it won't be so bad.


Here is my Super-Optimist vision to bail on the MAC:

East
UConn
Buffalo
UMass
Temple
WVU
Ohio
Louisville
Cincy

West
Memphis
Tulane
SMU
Houston
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Kansas
Kansas State

Why would anyone want the Athens TV market? They wouldn’t. Most of our alumni are in Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati. It’s time to stop pretending our TV market is Athens and Nelsonville and acknowledge we have some Bobcat fans who would prefer to watch the Bobcats over the Buckeyes around the rest of the state.


Well, I don't think anything like this will happen now, but years ago the MAC blew a deal that had Louisville and Cincinnati ready to join the MAC. It was a big headline in newspapers around the area -- including the Columbus Citizen-Journal (anybody remember that one?). However, the deal fell through because at the last minute the MAC Daddies refused to increase the MAC football scholarship number to the then national D1 limit of 105. In UC's case, of course, it was a chance to rejoin the MAC. This was back in the days when the MAC was a seven team league with Ohio, Toledo, BGSU, WMU, Kent State, Miami, and Marshall. These additions would have made it a nine-team league. I was so excited when this was announced, and I felt crushed when it fell through a few days later. I won't get my hopes up again, and it seems much less logical and possible today than it did back then. Louisville was much less a power program in football and basketball at that time, and Cincinnati had not yet tasted the glory of the Big East and BCS football. I think that boat has sailed.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
Flat Tire
General User

Member Since: 12/24/2006
Post Count: 119

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 7:00:45 AM 
I believe UC was a charter member of the MAC. UC was a member from 1946 and left in 1953.
Back to Top
  
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User

Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 3,299

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 7:20:58 AM 
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
cc-cat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.


The former. Of course they would join the super.


It depends who is staying in the "new" Big 12. Maybe I'm jaded by considering basketball, but from a basketball perspective I think that'd be an extremely attractive league for Cincinnati and "not bad" for football.


Unfortunately basketball has never been the driver in a lot of these decisions. You can't do much better than Kansas, TxTech, OkSt and Baylor in that regard.

And I'm afraid they'll run into the same issues that WVU has with the league in regards to travel. But if a few other local schools were added maybe it won't be so bad.


Here is my Super-Optimist vision to bail on the MAC:

East
UConn
Buffalo
UMass
Temple
WVU
Ohio
Louisville
Cincy

West
Memphis
Tulane
SMU
Houston
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Kansas
Kansas State

Why would anyone want the Athens TV market? They wouldn’t. Most of our alumni are in Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati. It’s time to stop pretending our TV market is Athens and Nelsonville and acknowledge we have some Bobcat fans who would prefer to watch the Bobcats over the Buckeyes around the rest of the state.


Really living up to your username here.
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,016

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 10:27:11 AM 
Flat Tire wrote:
I believe UC was a charter member of the MAC. UC was a member from 1946 and left in 1953.


And, their leaving was not voluntary, either, despite how it looks on paper. My father was president of the Faculty Advisory Council (precursor to Faculty Senate) and was in on the debate. Ohio University and a majority of the MAC administrations asked UC to withdraw. I don't remember the details that Dad told me, but it revolved around recruiting and/or player eligibility irregularities in football.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 6,940

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 10:29:51 AM 
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
cc-cat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.


The former. Of course they would join the super.


It depends who is staying in the "new" Big 12. Maybe I'm jaded by considering basketball, but from a basketball perspective I think that'd be an extremely attractive league for Cincinnati and "not bad" for football.


Unfortunately basketball has never been the driver in a lot of these decisions. You can't do much better than Kansas, TxTech, OkSt and Baylor in that regard.

And I'm afraid they'll run into the same issues that WVU has with the league in regards to travel. But if a few other local schools were added maybe it won't be so bad.


Here is my Super-Optimist vision to bail on the MAC:

East
UConn
Buffalo
UMass
Temple
WVU
Ohio
Louisville
Cincy

West
Memphis
Tulane
SMU
Houston
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Kansas
Kansas State

Why would anyone want the Athens TV market? They wouldn’t. Most of our alumni are in Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati. It’s time to stop pretending our TV market is Athens and Nelsonville and acknowledge we have some Bobcat fans who would prefer to watch the Bobcats over the Buckeyes around the rest of the state.


Hey if you wanna get silly, at least be a little bit realistic.

Conference-USA blows up and the remaining parts are spread to the MAC, Sun Belt, and upcoming new WAC. Army decides they want to join a conference because of the new playoff structure.

Calling this 16-team conference BIG MAC, sponsored by McDonalds.

POD 1: Kent State, Akron, Buffalo, Army
POD 2: Miami, Toledo, Bowling Green, Eastern Michigan
POD 3: Western Michigan, Central Michigan, Ball State, Northern Illinois
POD 4: Ohio, Marshall, Western Kentucky, Middle Tennessee

In this scenario Ohio is probably getting screwed the most because they don't maintain any of their natural rivalries. But this makes it easiest on travel for everyone.

Nine game conference schedule, playing everyone in your POD every season. Then you play two opponents from every other POD on a rotation schedule.
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,016

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 10:37:04 AM 
Don't know about the pods, GoCats105, but I do think Marshall, WKU, and maybe MTU make a lot of sense in a realigned MAC. I'd also throw EMU out, and maybe Akron. Maybe add Illinois State and Indiana State.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 6,940

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 12:15:27 PM 
OhioCatFan wrote:
Don't know about the pods, GoCats105, but I do think Marshall, WKU, and maybe MTU make a lot of sense in a realigned MAC. I'd also throw EMU out, and maybe Akron. Maybe add Illinois State and Indiana State.


Sure lets throw out some and try to establish new conference mates AND level them up from FCS to FBS. If we're gonna do that, at least bring in a great football program like James Madison.
Back to Top
  
OUcats82
General User



Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,829

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 12:51:19 PM 
cc-cat wrote:
colobobcat66 wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
I could see this eventually working out to 4 16 team conferences for a 64 team division and then everyone else in a lower division.


Well there’s 65 teams (including ND) in the P-5 now so that just shuffles the teams with not much change in the teams involved. So which current P-5 team gets left out or do some current G-5 teams (Houston, BYU, Boise, Cincy, Memphis, CF) make it and replace more current P-5 teams (Vanderbilt, TCU, Wake Forrest )?


Army, Navy, and Air Force will want in and Congress will (in public and behind the scenes) make it happen.


And I personally would be more than OK with this.


Ohio-The State University

Back to Top
  
giacomo
General User

Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,631

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 4:38:41 PM 
As they say here in Western PA, yinz guys are really thinking about this stuff!
Back to Top
  
Campus Flow
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 4,959

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 7:11:24 PM 
Introducing the 20 Team SEC.

Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri and Texas A&M
Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss and Mississippi State
Alabama. Auburn, Tennessee and Vanderbilt
Georgia, Florida, Kentucky and South Carolina
Ohio, West Virginia, Clemson, Florida State

Pitch to the SEC a plan expanding Peden to 50,000 to make it happen.


Most Memorable Bobcat Events Attended
2010 97-83 win over Georgetown in NCAA 1st round
2012 45-13 victory over ULM in the Independence Bowl
2015 34-3 drubbing of Miami @ Peden front of 25,086

Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  51 - 75  of 97 Posts
Jump to Page:  < Previous    1 | 2 | 3 | 4    Next >
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties