Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  espn weekly leaders

Topic:  espn weekly leaders
Author
Message
Ohio Pilot
General User

Member Since: 9/5/2010
Post Count: 499

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  espn weekly leaders
   Posted: 10/9/2010 10:23:13 PM 
Shouldn't Bates be number 10 on the rushing leader board?


http://espn.go.com/college-football/weekly/_/week/6/seaso...

Last Edited: 10/9/2010 10:23:40 PM by Ohio Pilot

Back to Top
  
Cat4ever
General User

Member Since: 12/29/2007
Location: Oakland, FL
Post Count: 447

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: espn weekly leaders
   Posted: 10/10/2010 7:41:19 AM 
Ohio Pilot wrote:
Shouldn't Bates be number 10 on the rushing leader board?


http://espn.go.com/college-football/weekly/_/week/6/seaso...


Depending upon the source, Phil rushed for 142 yards (ESPN.com) or 144 yards (OhioBobcats.com). The latter is probably based on the official game stats.


The only thing that is a fact is that nothing is a fact.
If this statement is true, it is also false.
                  --Dr. Donald Horning, circa 1965

Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: espn weekly leaders
   Posted: 10/10/2010 8:28:24 AM 
Cat4ever wrote:
Ohio Pilot wrote:
Shouldn't Bates be number 10 on the rushing leader board?


http://espn.go.com/college-football/weekly/_/week/6/seaso...


Depending upon the source, Phil rushed for 142 yards (ESPN.com) or 144 yards (OhioBobcats.com). The latter is probably based on the official game stats.


Cat, interesting link. Look at the top five passing performances vs the top five rushing performances and check to see which resulted in more wins. Three of the top five passing performances were in losses, while all five of the top rushing resulted in wins.


"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
John C. Wanamaker
General User



Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: espn weekly leaders
   Posted: 10/10/2010 10:01:09 AM 
Bcat2 wrote:
Cat4ever wrote:
Ohio Pilot wrote:
Shouldn't Bates be number 10 on the rushing leader board?


http://espn.go.com/college-football/weekly/_/week/6/seaso...


Depending upon the source, Phil rushed for 142 yards (ESPN.com) or 144 yards (OhioBobcats.com). The latter is probably based on the official game stats.


Cat, interesting link. Look at the top five passing performances vs the top five rushing performances and check to see which resulted in more wins. Three of the top five passing performances were in losses, while all five of the top rushing resulted in wins.


Football has evolved, but one thing has not changed, run the football and stop the run, keys for victory!


"Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half."

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,498

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: espn weekly leaders
   Posted: 10/10/2010 12:24:13 PM 
John C. Wanamaker wrote:
Football has evolved, but one thing has not changed, run the football and stop the run, keys for victory!

Very, very true, JCW.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Ohio Pilot
General User

Member Since: 9/5/2010
Post Count: 499

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: espn weekly leaders
   Posted: 10/10/2010 3:12:39 PM 
When i posted this all the games were not over and number 10 on the list was 139 yards so he should of been on it then. But now that all the games are down he obviously wouldnt of made it to the final list. My bad guys.
Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: espn weekly leaders
   Posted: 10/10/2010 4:24:14 PM 
L.C. wrote:
John C. Wanamaker wrote:
Football has evolved, but one thing has not changed, run the football and stop the run, keys for victory!

Very, very true, JCW.


Another reason that I like two back sets and/or having the qb under center so that our backs are closer/quicker to hitting the hole.  I don't think that this sacrifices any significant vision for the running backs.


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 7  of 7 Posts
Jump to Page:  1
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             





Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties