BobcatAttack.com - For Fans of Ohio University Sports

Welcome Guest!
Create an Account

site search

about us

advertise with us

help

BobcatAttack.com Message Board

Ohio Football

Topic: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Topic: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Author

Message

Pataskala
General User

Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,365

Status: Offline

It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/18/2010 11:32:31 PM

Sept. 3-at New Mexico State (1-11)

Sept. 10-GARDNER-WEBB (4-7)

Sept. 17-MARSHALL (5-7)

Sept. 24-at Rutgers (4-8)
FIAMI (9-4 with a new coach)
TEMPS (8-4 with a new coach)
KENT (5-7 with a new coach)
at Akron (1-11)
at Buffalo (2-10)
at BG (2-10)
Two Western Div. teams

Shapes up to be the 120th toughest schedule in the country.

We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.

Donuts
General User

Member Since: 9/22/2010
Post Count: 730

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/18/2010 11:34:00 PM

Undefeated

Robert Fox
General User

Member Since: 11/16/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/18/2010 11:34:01 PM

I like the positive thoughts. But if we make it to a bowl, we may still get blown out by a Sun Belt team.

bigbobcat
General User

Member Since: 11/27/2010
Post Count: 36

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/18/2010 11:34:21 PM

If it was the same team as this year we would easily go 9-1... but losing the seniors we are losing there is no saying

Andrew Ruck
General User

Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,233

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/18/2010 11:39:25 PM

It shapes up for another MAC East title run, 8-10 win season...Then pounded in the MAC Championship and bowl game again.

Andrew Ruck
B.B.A. 2003

Pataskala
General User

Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,365

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/18/2010 11:43:09 PM

bigbobcat wrote:

If it was the same team as this year we would easily go 9-1... but losing the seniors we are losing there is no saying

But we'll still have Keller and Moore on D, and Brazill on O, but with maybe no one who can get it to him. And having Brazill back should help the return game, which has really been soft this year.

We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.

Ohio Here
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 151

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/18/2010 11:43:50 PM

Andrew Ruck wrote:

It shapes up for another MAC East title run, 8-10 win season...Then pounded in the MAC Championship and bowl game again.

Until we see different results, this is most likely. Quite the pattern they've formed.

perimeterpost
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/18/2010 11:51:16 PM

We need a reliable QB. period. (no knock on 5 and 8)

I'd be willing to go all SMU like and chip in to get a kid with a strong arm a gold tran am if it means we can take the field with confidence on offense. Why are we a running team with no running backs and NFL ready wide recievers?

MY STATE. MY TEAM.

bigbobcat
General User

Member Since: 11/27/2010
Post Count: 36

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/19/2010 12:00:01 AM

Pretty sure we have two reliable qb's red-shirting this year. Only time will tell but I have heard good things.

C Money
General User

Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/19/2010 12:16:01 AM

perimeterpost wrote:

Why are we a running team with no running backs and NFL ready wide recievers?

Agree with this 100%. We don't have a FB to lead the way in a conventional running offense, and other than Boykin we don't have a power back, so we have to run from the spread. But running from the spread doesn't work without a downfield passing threat, and Bates has not shown that he can throw down the field. All the while our best asset, our ridiculous WR corps, is completely under-utilized.

cc-cat
General User

Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 3,949

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/19/2010 12:20:56 AM

This team was never that good this year. we won games we should have, but did not distinguish ourselves. We need to improve before we start talking making a run. Will be good to get some key defenders back.

CeramicBobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/23/2005
Location: Brookpark, OH
Post Count: 32

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/19/2010 12:45:20 AM

perimeterpost wrote:

We do go SMU. WE got the OBC pledges...We got a grand. Let's go all Vegas Baby! with it.

CeramicBobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/23/2005
Location: Brookpark, OH
Post Count: 32

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/19/2010 12:47:14 AM

C Money wrote:

perimeterpost wrote:

Why are we a running team with no running backs and NFL ready wide recievers?

On play #2 Bates did show he can throw it down field...just not to OUr team.

Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/19/2010 1:51:51 AM

Our next year's sched has to be one of the easiest in college football history. If we don't win most of those by over 30 points, we still stink.

Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!

DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

bobcat28
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: United States
Post Count: 808

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/19/2010 9:33:29 AM

8 or 9 wins might not be enough next year to earn the right to get embarrassed in a bowl. We only went this year because usc is on probation and there was an asu scheduling snafu.

Casper71
General User

Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,090

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/20/2010 11:59:18 AM

Anybody wanna give me points with Rutgers and Marshall?

I said it earlier, we have the talent to win in the MAC but not against CUSA or low level BCS teams. I consider Marshall and Rutgers in the latter category.

When all is said and done, we'll got 2-2 OOC qnd 6-2 or 5-3 in Conference to be Bowl eligible again.

Is that all there is?

Ohio Alum84
General User

Member Since: 7/29/2010
Location: Washington Court House, OH
Post Count: 115

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/24/2010 12:21:24 AM

[QUOTE=Pataskala]

Sept. 3-at New Mexico State (1-11)

Sept. 10-GARDNER-WEBB (4-7)

Sept. 17-MARSHALL (5-7)

Thanks for posting next year's schedule - are you sure about the non-league games?

UpSan Bobcat
General User

Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,812

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/24/2010 7:57:00 AM

Yes, that should be right, and most likely the West games will be at Central Michigan and vs. Western Michigan.

71 BOBCAT
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 1,903

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/24/2010 8:21:05 AM

Interesting that at best we will play 4 opponents that had winning records this year.
If we can't increase our win total to 9-10 next year with this schedule then we have some real issues.

GO BOBCATS

Pataskala
General User

Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,365

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/24/2010 2:15:47 PM

Ohio Alum84 wrote:

[QUOTE=Pataskala]

Sept. 3-at New Mexico State (1-11)

Sept. 10-GARDNER-WEBB (4-7)

Sept. 17-MARSHALL (5-7)

Thanks for posting next year's schedule - are you sure about the non-league games?

It's from a 2009 press release announcing the nonconference schedule through '15 (http://www.ohiobobcats.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/03020...; Haven't seen any changes since then.

We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.

davepi2
General User

Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: columbus, OH
Post Count: 583

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/26/2010 7:41:07 PM

Interesting choice on western and central for next year's west opponents. I had figured central on the road and ball state here. Everyone else in the west has been played at least twice since 2006. Central once here in 08 and ball state away in 09.

UpSan Bobcat
General User

Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,812

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/26/2010 8:57:54 PM

We played Toledo and Eastern Michigan this year and Northern Illinois and Ball State last year, so that basically leaves Central and Western next in the rotation.

WillFrasure
General User

Member Since: 12/28/2010
Post Count: 8

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/28/2010 1:38:12 PM

Let me know what you all think of this early look at the 2011 offense: http://thepostonline.net/sportswordpress/?p=1970

Doc Bobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,281

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/28/2010 2:13:22 PM

WillFrasure wrote:

Let me know what you all think of this early look at the 2011 offense: http://thepostonline.net/sportswordpress/?p=1970

Good job.

I think a few names may need to be added.....although you did mention Tyler Tettleton it's been mentioned to me that he was the best of the scout QB's last year. Also Derek Roback came here to play QB, but at about 6'3"-230 with good speed he's too good of an athlete to sit on the bench.

RB wise another player who transfered so that he could get more pt is Beau Blankenship from Iowa State.

Bobcat36
General User

Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 1,167

Status: Offline

RE: It's 48-14 -- let's look at 2011

Posted: 12/28/2010 2:23:57 PM

Very well written Will!

Completely agree with your take on QB (Snyder / Bates rotation) but would not be surpprised to see Tyler win it either...He seems like a great mix of both.

I'm hoping we see more of Boykin than we did in 2010. It's obviously nice to have the depth but I hate to see him wasting away on the sidelines...He's a serious force. Also hoping to see a FB in this year's recruiting class.

Agree again on the O Line...They should roll next year. I also hope we see more of Thompson down field!

Do you happen to have any insight into the status of N'goumou? I was kind of hoping he'd step up eventually and maybe take over slot if Riley does end up moving outside or become the new fade target. Either way this unit will be stout yet again...I'm excited to see Brazill and Foster on the field at the same time.

Also a little light on what's in store for Roback would be huge if you have any??

Last Edited: 12/28/2010 2:44:49 PM by Bobcat36

GoBobcats!!!! Always have been and always will be... Ohio's First and Finest!

Showing Replies:	1 - 25 of 29 Posts
Jump to Page:	1 \| 2 Next >

View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics

There are 473 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com

471 Guests
2 Registered Users:
	Cleveburg Bri, shabamon

There are no other users looking at this page.