Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board
BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Basketball
Topic:  Basket Interference inquiries

Topic:  Basket Interference inquiries
Author
Message
emoney
General User

Member Since: 3/9/2012
Post Count: 53

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 9:28:34 AM 
I know what the play was last night and that is obvious, but for further knowledge, I would to try and explore the play a bit further. So originally, the scorer's table ruled a "tap-in" and awarded two points. Now, the tv announcers were talking about basket interference and two points. But if you had basket interference on a free throw, wouldn't you just award 1 point anyway? Just like if you took a ball off the top of the rim on a three point shot, the offensive team would be awarded three points. If the ball is off the cylinder, then gets tipped in, yes two points.

I am still in the process of looking up everything on the rule. Just something I was mulling around and thought maybe I could learn something.  
Back to Top
  
OUVan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 9:34:35 AM 
Basket interference on a FT is worth 1 point. 

Last Edited: 3/11/2012 9:34:53 AM by OUVan
Back to Top
  
bobcatsquared
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,419

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 9:39:40 AM 
    How about another rule's clarification from last night's game. Does a thrown elbow that does not connect merit a technical foul?

Last Edited: 3/11/2012 9:40:00 AM by bobcatsquared
Back to Top
  
OUVan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 9:42:23 AM 
bobcatsquared wrote:
    How about another rule's clarification from last night's game. Does a thrown elbow that does not connect merit a technical foul?


I would say yes but in looking at the replay I'm not sure he was actually throwing an elbow. Smith had his shirt at the shoulder and it looked to me like he jerked his elbow trying to get Smith off of him.  It did signal the beginning of the pout-fest by Zeke though.
Back to Top
  
Pataskala
General User

Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,365

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 11:06:37 AM 
OUVan wrote:
bobcatsquared wrote:
    How about another rule's clarification from last night's game. Does a thrown elbow that does not connect merit a technical foul?


I would say yes but in looking at the replay I'm not sure he was actually throwing an elbow. Smith had his shirt at the shoulder and it looked to me like he jerked his elbow trying to get Smith off of him.  It did signal the beginning of the pout-fest by Zeke though.


Marshall's a great talent but he's waaaaay too thin skinned.  He's got a bunch of growing up to do -- and only one year to do it (at least at the college level).

I'll take Jon Smith any day.  He plays a lot bigger than 6-7.  For a sophomore, he has plenty of poise and is hugely aggressive around the rim.  He just needs to work on FTs.

We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.
Back to Top
  
shabamon
General User



Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 6,878

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 12:03:34 PM 
bobcatsquared wrote:
    How about another rule's clarification from last night's game. Does a thrown elbow that does not connect merit a technical foul?


I remember watching a game where Devin Davis threw an elbow that didn't connect and he still got called for a tech.
Back to Top
  
SBH
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,293

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 12:05:51 PM 
Another interference (non) call could have made the final call inconsequential.  John Smith was blocked on a dunk very late in the game. But there's a photo on the ABJ's site (Ohio.com) that shows Akron's Quincy Diggs with his hand up and through the net and hoop - that should have been 2 points.
Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,234

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 12:08:46 PM 
SBH wrote:
Another interference (non) call could have made the final call inconsequential.  John Smith was blocked on a dunk very late in the game. But there's a photo on the ABJ's site (Ohio.com) that shows Akron's Quincy Diggs with his hand up and through the net and hoop - that should have been 2 points.




Here's the photo although it was actually Gilliam.  It's photo number 8.

http://www.ohio.com/news/top-stories/mac-tournament-ohio-...

Last Edited: 3/11/2012 12:09:43 PM by Alan Swank
Back to Top
  
C Money
General User



Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 12:57:42 PM 
The refs got the basket interference call on Reggie right. The Kron fans thought a technical should have also been assessed, but they're wrong.  Check out Rule 9, Section 17, Article 1.a. For basket interference during a free throw, one point is awarded. For goaltending on a free throw, it's one point and a technical. This was basket interference, and the shot went, so it's a moot point.

http://www.ncaapublications.com/productdownloads/BR11.pdf
Back to Top
  
emoney
General User

Member Since: 3/9/2012
Post Count: 53

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 1:13:40 PM 
Yes C Money. Excellent point. A lot of people do not know the difference between basket interference and goaltending. 
Back to Top
  
OhioStunter
General User



Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 9:21:08 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
SBH wrote:
Another interference (non) call could have made the final call inconsequential.  John Smith was blocked on a dunk very late in the game. But there's a photo on the ABJ's site (Ohio.com) that shows Akron's Quincy Diggs with his hand up and through the net and hoop - that should have been 2 points.



Here's the photo although it was actually Gilliam.  It's photo number 8.

http://www.ohio.com/news/top-stories/mac-tournament-ohio-...
Back to Top
  
mf279801
General User

Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,473

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 9:28:30 PM 
OhioStunter wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
SBH wrote:
Another interference (non) call could have made the final call inconsequential.  John Smith was blocked on a dunk very late in the game. But there's a photo on the ABJ's site (Ohio.com) that shows Akron's Quincy Diggs with his hand up and through the net and hoop - that should have been 2 points.



Here's the photo although it was actually Gilliam.  It's photo number 8.

http://www.ohio.com/news/top-stories/mac-tournament-ohio-...





Damn, I thought I saw that on TV last night. I figured that since there was no call my eyes had gotten it wrong.
Back to Top
  
MonroeClassmate
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,170

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 9:33:03 PM 
OhioStunter wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
SBH wrote:
Another interference (non) call could have made the final call inconsequential.  John Smith was blocked on a dunk very late in the game. But there's a photo on the ABJ's site (Ohio.com) that shows Akron's Quincy Diggs with his hand up and through the net and hoop - that should have been 2 points.



Here's the photo although it was actually Gilliam.  It's photo number 8.

http://www.ohio.com/news/top-stories/mac-tournament-ohio-...





Outstanding photo!

IMO the refs went to the monitor to see if the ball was tipped and within the cylinder and that is the only thing they went to the monitor to view.  I don't believe the refs can spot something in the tapes that wasn't the original purpose of the monitor viewing.  Reg might have touched the rim but also witnessed in the viewing they could have seen Smith getting physically pushed completely out of the play from behind as he tried to box out.
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,781

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/11/2012 10:15:09 PM 
mf279801 wrote:
Damn, I thought I saw that on TV last night. I figured that since there was no call my eyes had gotten it wrong.
 

Me too.  I said to my wife that I saw a hand go up through the net and that it should be basket interference or goal tending.  Like you, after it wasn't called I thought maybe I was seeing things or it was another example of a bad camera angle that made it look like the hand was up through the middle of basket but it really wasn't.  It happened so fast that I just wasn't sure.  I'm so glad to find out that I wasn't seeing things.  Funny how several of us at home saw this and the officials didn't. 

Last Edited: 3/11/2012 10:16:40 PM by OhioCatFan

The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
JSF
General User



Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,554

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Basket Interference inquiries
   Posted: 3/12/2012 12:33:25 AM 
The referees went to the monitor to check the clock.

"Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season.

My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8

Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 15  of 15 Posts
Jump to Page:  1
View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             



WHO'S ONLINE
There are 124 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com
124 Guests
0 Registered Users
There are no other users looking at this page.




Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties