Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Basketball
Topic:  The MAC Tournament starts today!: updated 3/9/13

Topic:  The MAC Tournament starts today!: updated 3/9/13
Author
Message
Shawn Sellers
General User

Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 221

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  The MAC Tournament starts today!: updated 3/9/13
   Posted: 2/4/2013 3:12:48 PM 

MAC tournament seeding updated with results through the end of the regular season:



 First Round - Monday March 11, 2013 - Campus Sites

Game 1: 9. CMU (4-12) @ 8. Buffalo (7-9)

Game 2: 10. NIU (3-13) @ 7. EMU (7-9)

Game 3: 11. Miami (3-13) @ 6. BGSU (7-9)



Second Round - Wednesday March 13, 2013 - Cleveland

Game 4. Game 1 winner vs. 5. Ball State (8-8) @ 6:30 PM -STO

Game 5: Game 2 winner vs. Game 3 winner @ 9:00 PM -STO



Third Round - Thursday, March 14, 2013 - Cleveland

Game 6: Game 4 winner vs. 4. Kent State (9-7) @ 6:30 PM - STO

Game 7. Game 5 winner vs. 3. WMU (10-6) @ 9:00 PM - STO



Semifinals - Friday March 15, 2013 - Cleveland

Game 8: Game 6 winner vs. 1. Akron (14-2) @ 6:30 PM - STO

Game 9: Game 7 winner vs. 2. Ohio (14-2) @ 9:00 PM - STO



Finals - Satuarday March 16, 2013 - Cleveland

Game 10: Game 8 winner vs. Game 9 Winner @ 6:30 PM - ESPN2



Tiebreakers:

1. 2 way Akron beat Ohio head to head: Akron is the 1 seed, Ohio is the 2 seed. 
3 way tie BGSU/EMU/Buffalo won-lost record of games played among tied teams, BGSU (2-1), EMU (1-1), Buffalo (1-2): BGSU is the 6 seed, EMU is the 7 seed, and Buffalo is the 8 seed.
2. 2 way NIU beat Miami head to head: NIU is the 10 seed, Miami is the 11 seed.

Go Bobcats!

 

 

 

 

Last Edited: 3/9/2013 8:20:42 PM by Shawn Sellers

Back to Top
  
The Optimist
General User



Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,597

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/4/2013 3:29:17 PM 
NIU gets a bye 


I've seen crazier things happen.

Back to Top
  
OU_Country
General User



Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,375

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/4/2013 3:30:25 PM 
So it is absolutely confirmed that Toledo won't participate this year because of APR?  Our friend's in the MAC office made a release today that indicated all 12 teams participating.  I asked our good friend J. Guy on twitter about it, but did not get a response.
Back to Top
  
Shawn Sellers
General User

Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 221

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/4/2013 4:06:06 PM 
OU_Country wrote:
So it is absolutely confirmed that Toledo won't participate this year because of APR?  Our friend's in the MAC office made a release today that indicated all 12 teams participating.  I asked our good friend J. Guy on twitter about it, but did not get a response.


hmm. I hadn't heard that yet. I wonder if they were referring to the Women's Tournament, which will have 12 teams participating. I guess I'll assume that Toledo isn't participating until the MAC website is updated.
Back to Top
  
Ohio69
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,062

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/4/2013 4:27:51 PM 
OU_Country wrote:
So it is absolutely confirmed that Toledo won't participate this year because of APR?  Our friend's in the MAC office made a release today that indicated all 12 teams participating.  I asked our good friend J. Guy on twitter about it, but did not get a response.


Darn.  I was hoping to have a nice time watching Toledo upset Akron on Friday night.


Can somebody hit a pull up jumper for me?.....

Back to Top
  
anorris
General User



Member Since: 7/6/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/4/2013 7:15:38 PM 
100% no Toledo in the MAC tournament.
Back to Top
  
OU_Country
General User



Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,375

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/5/2013 8:38:55 AM 
anorris wrote:
100% no Toledo in the MAC tournament.


So in other words, the MAC office and the Q just doesn't have their stuff together yet.  Just another day.
Back to Top
  
cc-cat
General User

Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 3,949

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/5/2013 9:18:34 AM 
So except for bragging rights, finishing first or second provides the same benefit (bye to the semis) in the tourney?

Last Edited: 2/5/2013 9:19:17 AM by cc-cat

Back to Top
  
OU_Country
General User



Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,375

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/5/2013 11:01:23 AM 
cc cat wrote:
So except for bragging rights, finishing first or second provides the same benefit (bye to the semis) in the tourney?


Depends on how you look at it.  Getting the first seed probably assures that we wouldn't play WMU in the semi's, which is a plus.

Also, I just looked and the MAC site has been corrected to reflect Toledo's exclusion this year.
Back to Top
  
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
General User



Member Since: 12/1/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 1,926

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/5/2013 11:21:45 AM 
cc cat wrote:
So except for bragging rights, finishing first or second provides the same benefit (bye to the semis) in the tourney?


Also guaranteed NIT birth should we not make NCAA's. People probably would say who cares, but the NIT is still a lot better than the CBI. 
Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/14/2013 1:26:59 AM 
If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today,

'kron sucks.


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
bobcatsquared
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,420

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/14/2013 7:51:47 AM 
Why do I bother opening threads where Monroe is listed under the "Last Comment" column?

Last Edited: 2/14/2013 7:52:14 AM by bobcatsquared

Back to Top
  
The Optimist
General User



Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,597

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/14/2013 8:23:42 AM 
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead wrote:
cc cat wrote:
So except for bragging rights, finishing first or second provides the same benefit (bye to the semis) in the tourney?


Also guaranteed NIT birth should we not make NCAA's. People probably would say who cares, but the NIT is still a lot better than the CBI. 

Without any research on the matter, I am assuming we would qualify as an NIT at-large this year.


I've seen crazier things happen.

Back to Top
  
OUbobcat9092
General User

Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post Count: 1,193

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/14/2013 9:37:40 AM 
The Optimist wrote:
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead wrote:
cc cat wrote:
So except for bragging rights, finishing first or second provides the same benefit (bye to the semis) in the tourney?


Also guaranteed NIT birth should we not make NCAA's. People probably would say who cares, but the NIT is still a lot better than the CBI.

Without any research on the matter, I am assuming we would qualify as an NIT at-large this year.


Well, no updates this season yet on NIT-ology, but I would assume that when we get to 24+ wins we would be a lock for the NIT, should we not happen to win the MAC Tourney.


Bring Back Men's Track & Field

Back to Top
  
OUbobcat9092
General User

Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post Count: 1,193

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/14/2013 9:49:08 AM 
With a 3.5 game lead over WMU for 2nd place, I would have to think that a top 2 seed is almost a lock for the MAC Tourney.


Bring Back Men's Track & Field

Back to Top
  
tevis48
General User

Member Since: 7/21/2010
Post Count: 58

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/14/2013 11:01:50 AM 
Hmmmm, I know Kent has had a REALLY down year so far, but there is still a part of me that would rather play WMU in a semi-final instead of the Flashes.
Back to Top
  
OUVan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/14/2013 11:52:06 AM 
tevis48 wrote:
Hmmmm, I know Kent has had a REALLY down year so far, but there is still a part of me that would rather play WMU in a semi-final instead of the Flashes.


I'm with you on that.  I'd even throw EMU ahead of WMU on the teams I'd least like to face.
Back to Top
  
Jeff McKinney
Moderator

Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,155

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/14/2013 12:07:11 PM 
Kent State seems to be playing better lately.  They have a lot of talent.  I've been saying all season long that if they gel, they could be a legitimate threat against Akron and/or Ohio in the tournament.

So, Ohio needs to come to play this Saturday!!
Back to Top
  
Eagle66
General User

Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 1,329

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/14/2013 1:17:38 PM 
Jeff McKinney wrote:
Kent State seems to be playing better lately.  They have a lot of talent.  I've been saying all season long that if they gel, they could be a legitimate threat against Akron and/or Ohio in the tournament.

So, Ohio needs to come to play this Saturday!!


I agree Jeff.  I maintain they have the 3rd best talent in the league.  I think it really comes down to how Randall Holt plays.  If he has a good game, they are a tough out. I'd like to see them finish 4 or 5 and make Akron beat them in the semis.
Back to Top
  
Chicken George
General User

Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 765

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/16/2013 9:57:43 PM 
I'm sure the seedings will change 50 more times between now and then, but I'm glad the MAC Tournament doesn't start Monday.  Based on the seedings listed above and assuming I read it correct, OHIO, WMU and Kent State all on the same side of the bracket with Akron getting a cake walk.

When I see the final tournament bracket, the first thing I'll look for is if we're on the other side of Kent State.  Don't care if that means were #1 or #2, I just don't want to play them again and want to see Kent vs Akron in the semis. 

Also, I'm sure it's been listed numerous times, but could someone remind me again what the tie breaker is if Ohio and Akron end the regular season both with one loss to one another?
Back to Top
  
Shawn Sellers
General User

Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 221

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/16/2013 10:20:30 PM 
Chicken George wrote:
I'm sure the seedings will change 50 more times between now and then, but I'm glad the MAC Tournament doesn't start Monday.  Based on the seedings listed above and assuming I read it correct, OHIO, WMU and Kent State all on the same side of the bracket with Akron getting a cake walk.

When I see the final tournament bracket, the first thing I'll look for is if we're on the other side of Kent State.  Don't care if that means were #1 or #2, I just don't want to play them again and want to see Kent vs Akron in the semis. 

Also, I'm sure it's been listed numerous times, but could someone remind me again what the tie breaker is if Ohio and Akron end the regular season both with one loss to one another?


That would come down to a coin flip as the tiebreaker.
Back to Top
  
Bobcat110
General User



Member Since: 3/5/2005
Location: Mount Gilead, OH
Post Count: 712

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/16/2013 11:01:11 PM 
Chicken George wrote:
I'm sure the seedings will change 50 more times between now and then, but I'm glad the MAC Tournament doesn't start Monday.  Based on the seedings listed above and assuming I read it correct, OHIO, WMU and Kent State all on the same side of the bracket with Akron getting a cake walk.


Of course, Ohio would only play one...either WMU or Kent.  They would play each other for opportunity to play us.  Kent would be playing 3rd game in 4 nights in above scenario if they survived to semi's.  If we finish 2nd, then we should have tougher road and Akron the easier. 
 
I think WMU's pretty much a lock for #3 and actually think Kent and EMU will slot into #4/#5 to balance bracket because Buffalo has much tougher schedule and may drop 3 of their last 4 to Akron, Ohio and at Kent.. they may lose all four with last one at BG.
Back to Top
  
Andrew Ruck
General User



Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,237

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/16/2013 11:56:34 PM 
Is it time to start to discussing the awkward and probable scenario in which Western Michigan grabs the #3 seed (a near certainty at this point) while Kent grabs the #4 or #5 seed (they aren't there yet, but are playing much better and have 3 of 4 games in which they'll be highly favored)...And suddenly, Akron and Ohio are preferring the 2 seed over the 1 seed?


Andrew Ruck
B.B.A. 2003

Back to Top
  
Chicken George
General User

Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 765

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/17/2013 12:12:59 AM 
Here's how I see the final standings:
1.  Akron
2.  Ohio
3.  WMU
4.  Kent St.
5. EMU
6. BGSU
7. Buffalo


In this scenario I prefer the #2 seed.  Hope we beat Akron at home and lose the coin flip personally.  Just my opinion.  
Back to Top
  
ts1227
General User

Member Since: 2/28/2006
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Post Count: 873

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: If the MAC Tournament seeding were determined today
   Posted: 2/20/2013 9:02:53 PM 
After tonight's win, looks like the path to the semifinal bye is now as simple as not losing out.  

Obviously we know what has to happen for a shot at #1.
Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 25  of 65 Posts
Jump to Page:  1 | 2 | 3    Next >
View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties