Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over

Topic:  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
Author
Message
The Optimist
General User



Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,552

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 7:19:01 PM 
Isn’t the entire point of realignment wild speculation on the internet?

If you really want me to get optimistic, let me tell you how I plan to convince the SEC to accept Ohio purely to cannibalize the recruiting efforts of OSU... (I swear, I had a dream where this happened and it was awesome)


I've seen crazier things happen.

Back to Top
  
The Optimist
General User



Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,552

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 7:20:59 PM 
OhioCatFan wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
cc-cat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.


The former. Of course they would join the super.


It depends who is staying in the "new" Big 12. Maybe I'm jaded by considering basketball, but from a basketball perspective I think that'd be an extremely attractive league for Cincinnati and "not bad" for football.


Unfortunately basketball has never been the driver in a lot of these decisions. You can't do much better than Kansas, TxTech, OkSt and Baylor in that regard.

And I'm afraid they'll run into the same issues that WVU has with the league in regards to travel. But if a few other local schools were added maybe it won't be so bad.


Here is my Super-Optimist vision to bail on the MAC:

East
UConn
Buffalo
UMass
Temple
WVU
Ohio
Louisville
Cincy

West
Memphis
Tulane
SMU
Houston
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Kansas
Kansas State

Why would anyone want the Athens TV market? They wouldn’t. Most of our alumni are in Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati. It’s time to stop pretending our TV market is Athens and Nelsonville and acknowledge we have some Bobcat fans who would prefer to watch the Bobcats over the Buckeyes around the rest of the state.


Well, I don't think anything like this will happen now, but years ago the MAC blew a deal that had Louisville and Cincinnati ready to join the MAC. It was a big headline in newspapers around the area -- including the Columbus Citizen-Journal (anybody remember that one?). However, the deal fell through because at the last minute the MAC Daddies refused to increase the MAC football scholarship number to the then national D1 limit of 105. In UC's case, of course, it was a chance to rejoin the MAC. This was back in the days when the MAC was a seven team league with Ohio, Toledo, BGSU, WMU, Kent State, Miami, and Marshall. These additions would have made it a nine-team league. I was so excited when this was announced, and I felt crushed when it fell through a few days later. I won't get my hopes up again, and it seems much less logical and possible today than it did back then. Louisville was much less a power program in football and basketball at that time, and Cincinnati had not yet tasted the glory of the Big East and BCS football. I think that boat has sailed.


Very interesting. Did not know any of this!


I've seen crazier things happen.

Back to Top
  
The Optimist
General User



Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,552

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 7:22:14 PM 
GoCats105 wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
cc-cat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OU and Texas formally submitted their request letter to the SEC today.

Also, I read elsewhere that games not involving OU or Texas pulled about the same TV rating as an AAC game. So if you're Cincinnati do you really wanna join that? What's the benefit?


If you mean joining the crippled Big 12 - there is no reason.

If you mean joining one of the new super conferences - I can give you tens of millions of reasons.


The former. Of course they would join the super.


It depends who is staying in the "new" Big 12. Maybe I'm jaded by considering basketball, but from a basketball perspective I think that'd be an extremely attractive league for Cincinnati and "not bad" for football.


Unfortunately basketball has never been the driver in a lot of these decisions. You can't do much better than Kansas, TxTech, OkSt and Baylor in that regard.

And I'm afraid they'll run into the same issues that WVU has with the league in regards to travel. But if a few other local schools were added maybe it won't be so bad.


Here is my Super-Optimist vision to bail on the MAC:

East
UConn
Buffalo
UMass
Temple
WVU
Ohio
Louisville
Cincy

West
Memphis
Tulane
SMU
Houston
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Kansas
Kansas State

Why would anyone want the Athens TV market? They wouldn’t. Most of our alumni are in Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati. It’s time to stop pretending our TV market is Athens and Nelsonville and acknowledge we have some Bobcat fans who would prefer to watch the Bobcats over the Buckeyes around the rest of the state.


Hey if you wanna get silly, at least be a little bit realistic.

Conference-USA blows up and the remaining parts are spread to the MAC, Sun Belt, and upcoming new WAC. Army decides they want to join a conference because of the new playoff structure.

Calling this 16-team conference BIG MAC, sponsored by McDonalds.

POD 1: Kent State, Akron, Buffalo, Army
POD 2: Miami, Toledo, Bowling Green, Eastern Michigan
POD 3: Western Michigan, Central Michigan, Ball State, Northern Illinois
POD 4: Ohio, Marshall, Western Kentucky, Middle Tennessee

In this scenario Ohio is probably getting screwed the most because they don't maintain any of their natural rivalries. But this makes it easiest on travel for everyone.

Nine game conference schedule, playing everyone in your POD every season. Then you play two opponents from every other POD on a rotation schedule.

I would REALLY like to get back into the same conference as Marshall. Let bygones be bygones for the good of OHIO


I've seen crazier things happen.

Back to Top
  
The Optimist
General User



Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,552

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 7:24:18 PM 
Club Hyatt wrote:
Introducing the 20 Team SEC.

Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri and Texas A&M
Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss and Mississippi State
Alabama. Auburn, Tennessee and Vanderbilt
Georgia, Florida, Kentucky and South Carolina
Ohio, West Virginia, Clemson, Florida State

Pitch to the SEC a plan expanding Peden to 50,000 to make it happen.


Just tell the SEC we can help cannibalize OSU giving Bama a better chance in the playoffs every year. It’s so crazy it just might work.


I've seen crazier things happen.

Back to Top
  
Campus Flow
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 4,952

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/28/2021 10:27:36 PM 
The Optimist wrote:
Club Hyatt wrote:
Introducing the 20 Team SEC.

Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri and Texas A&M
Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss and Mississippi State
Alabama. Auburn, Tennessee and Vanderbilt
Georgia, Florida, Kentucky and South Carolina
Ohio, West Virginia, Clemson, Florida State

Pitch to the SEC a plan expanding Peden to 50,000 to make it happen.


Just tell the SEC we can help cannibalize OSU giving Bama a better chance in the playoffs every year. It’s so crazy it just might work.


Frank was on the press conference talking about wanting to be a regular Top 25 program and one of the best in the nation. If that is where you want to go I think you've got to seriously consider moving up conferences.

There was a time when Ohio was invisible to ESPN but we've played in 11 bowls and 8 NCAA tournament games since 2005, not to mention 12 years of weeknight football. The football program has done better in a rising era of opportunity which says a higher level is possible if we move up.


Most Memorable Bobcat Events Attended
2010 97-83 win over Georgetown in NCAA 1st round
2012 45-13 victory over ULM in the Independence Bowl
2015 34-3 drubbing of Miami @ Peden front of 25,086

Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,016

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/29/2021 12:07:18 AM 
Club Hyatt wrote:
Introducing the 20 Team SEC.

Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri and Texas A&M
Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss and Mississippi State
Alabama. Auburn, Tennessee and Vanderbilt
Georgia, Florida, Kentucky and South Carolina
Ohio, West Virginia, Clemson, Florida State

Pitch to the SEC a plan expanding Peden to 50,000 to make it happen.


I nominate BTC as the new SEC commissioner. He's only one here visionary enough to have advocated long and loud for years for that stadium upgrade. He is a man among boys and leader like Moses and a prophet like Isaiah. We are so fortunate to have known him back when!


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,016

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/29/2021 12:10:02 AM 
The Optimist wrote:
Isn’t the entire point of realignment wild speculation on the internet?

If you really want me to get optimistic, let me tell you how I plan to convince the SEC to accept Ohio purely to cannibalize the recruiting efforts of OSU... (I swear, I had a dream where this happened and it was awesome)


I really like your dreams!


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 6,913

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/29/2021 5:40:32 PM 
The SEC voted unanimously to extend invitations to both Texas and Oklahoma today.
Back to Top
  
cbus cat fan
General User

Member Since: 12/2/2011
Post Count: 1,169

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/30/2021 10:47:49 AM 
GoCats105 wrote:
The SEC voted unanimously to extend invitations to both Texas and Oklahoma today.


I mentioned this a few days ago in reference to a twitter post from Tony Barnhart. Let's face it, the teams were strong armed into this whether they like it or not, the SEC is a juggernaut and fast moving freight train (pick your cliche) and they are setting the agenda, even as the Big 12 tried to make one last stand via a court battle with ESPN.

When all is said and done, I believe it will have a ramfications for the MAC. The question is whether the ramfications will be positive or negative?

Last Edited: 7/30/2021 10:48:59 AM by cbus cat fan

Back to Top
  
Jeff Johnson
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post Count: 176

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 7/30/2021 11:28:41 AM 
GoCats105 wrote:
The SEC voted unanimously to extend invitations to both Texas and Oklahoma today.


And today the regents of UT-Austin voted to approve the move to SEC...

https://news.utexas.edu/2021/07/30/university-of-texas-sy... /


Jeff Johnson '67, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Back in the Land of Enchantment

Back to Top
  
BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 9,478

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/3/2021 9:10:05 AM 
cbus cat fan wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
The SEC voted unanimously to extend invitations to both Texas and Oklahoma today.


I mentioned this a few days ago in reference to a twitter post from Tony Barnhart. Let's face it, the teams were strong armed into this whether they like it or not, the SEC is a juggernaut and fast moving freight train (pick your cliche) and they are setting the agenda, even as the Big 12 tried to make one last stand via a court battle with ESPN.

When all is said and done, I believe it will have a ramfications for the MAC. The question is whether the ramfications will be positive or negative?


Yep, there would have been easy no votes on this if the SEC did not threaten the hammer on the dissenters.
Back to Top
  
giacomo
General User

Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,624

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/3/2021 3:29:06 PM 
maybe this is the solution:

We need to move away from the idea that college sports must be varsity N.C.A.A. programs, full of recruited stars. About 460,000 collegians compete at the N.C.A.A. level. More than 11 million play club or intramural sports, nearly all of them for the joy and intrinsic benefits of athletics.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/sports/college-sports-...
Back to Top
  
SVAC83
General User

Member Since: 10/1/2019
Post Count: 143

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/3/2021 4:28:45 PM 
why would any SEC team vote no?
Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 6,913

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/3/2021 5:31:50 PM 
SVAC83 wrote:
why would any SEC team vote no?


Texas A&M was just fine being the only Texas team in the SEC and there was still bad blood from the last round of realignment between them and UT...probably always will be. However their current AD Ross Bjork is an SEC guy who was the AD at Ole Miss before this. I'm sure someone sat them down and told them "for the good of the league" plus "we'll make a metric ton of money" which probably started to sound not so bad.

Last Edited: 8/3/2021 5:33:11 PM by GoCats105

Back to Top
  
rpbobcat
General User

Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,504

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/4/2021 7:28:26 AM 
There was a piece on ESPN about the Big 12 and PAC 12 looking into some kind
of "Strategic Partnership".

The Big 12 Commissioner has mentioned a possible merger or "Scheduling Alliance" with another conference.

He said that the Big 12 expects a 50% reduction in T.V. money when Texas and Oklahoma leaves.

The PAC 12 Commissioner used the phrase "dominos falling"

Back to Top
  
Pataskala
General User

Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,152

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/4/2021 10:50:48 AM 
rpbobcat wrote:
There was a piece on ESPN about the Big 12 and PAC 12 looking into some kind
of "Strategic Partnership".

The Big 12 Commissioner has mentioned a possible merger or "Scheduling Alliance" with another conference.

He said that the Big 12 expects a 50% reduction in T.V. money when Texas and Oklahoma leaves.

The PAC 12 Commissioner used the phrase "dominos falling"



There have also been rumors of a B10/Pac-12 merger or partnership in order to solidify their interest in the Rose Bowl. So what will probably come down is that the B10 will take two of the remaining eight B12 teams, the Pac-12 will take four, and two (probably WVU and one other) will wind up fending for themselves, likely to the AAC.


We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.

Back to Top
  
mf279801
General User

Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,452

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/4/2021 10:59:52 AM 
rpbobcat wrote:


He said that the Big 12 expects a 50% reduction in T.V. money when Texas and Oklahoma leaves.




The number I’ve seen (via Steven Godfrey i think) is closer to a 75% reduction. Going from ~$35million/school/year to ~$9million/school/year.
The remaining 8 teams just aren’t worth that much, from a “Football Television Broadcast Rights” perspective
Back to Top
  
SVAC83
General User

Member Since: 10/1/2019
Post Count: 143

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/4/2021 1:42:21 PM 
GoCats105 wrote:
SVAC83 wrote:
why would any SEC team vote no?


Texas A&M was just fine being the only Texas team in the SEC and there was still bad blood from the last round of realignment between them and UT...probably always will be. However their current AD Ross Bjork is an SEC guy who was the AD at Ole Miss before this. I'm sure someone sat them down and told them "for the good of the league" plus "we'll make a metric ton of money" which probably started to sound not so bad.


I just think we are still going to have this 12 team playoff format coming even with super-conferences. I think with texas and oklahoma now every year my guess is your going to get at least 4 SEC teams in the playoff. That means their are SEC teams that would of never of sniffed the current playoff format that may qualify off a 10-2 or 9-3 season.

Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,016

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/4/2021 3:19:31 PM 
SVAC83 wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
SVAC83 wrote:
why would any SEC team vote no?


Texas A&M was just fine being the only Texas team in the SEC and there was still bad blood from the last round of realignment between them and UT...probably always will be. However their current AD Ross Bjork is an SEC guy who was the AD at Ole Miss before this. I'm sure someone sat them down and told them "for the good of the league" plus "we'll make a metric ton of money" which probably started to sound not so bad.


I just think we are still going to have this 12 team playoff format coming even with super-conferences. I think with texas and oklahoma now every year my guess is your going to get at least 4 SEC teams in the playoff. That means their are SEC teams that would of never of sniffed the current playoff format that may qualify off a 10-2 or 9-3 season.



Your reasoning here make perfect sense to me. It would almost seem that this kind of playoff structure would be an understood (behind closed doors) part of the agreement before UT and OK would sign on the dotted line. They are going into a more competitive conference which they can't dominate, at least in the near future, so increasing their chances of making the playoffs would cancel out the negative of not getting in the current playoff system by beating up on Big12-10 opponents.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
Pataskala
General User

Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,152

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/4/2021 6:03:51 PM 
Saw a story today that Kansas is courting the B10. They'd just be another patsy in football but would be a good addition for b-ball.


We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.

Back to Top
  
rpbobcat
General User

Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,504

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/5/2021 6:40:02 AM 
There's an article in today's The Record by Evan Barnes talking about the AAC wanting to Absorb some or all of the remaining Big 12 teams.
Back to Top
  
OUPride
General User

Member Since: 9/21/2010
Post Count: 562

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
   Posted: 8/6/2021 8:02:14 PM 
So OSU and UM go to the SEC. B1G is good with Michigan since they still have MSU but have to backfill to keep a presence in Ohio. Ohio and UC to the Big Ten (so sorry Fiami, but you lose. You get NOTHING). I'm calling my shot right now, and you can't prove me wrong until OSU leaves. Fight Me!
Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  76 - 97  of 97 Posts
Jump to Page:  < Previous    1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties