Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  Conference ranks

Topic:  Conference ranks
Author
Message
ExCat21
General User

Member Since: 9/29/2014
Post Count: 1,089

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  Conference ranks
   Posted: 9/23/2024 3:44:16 PM 
Let's get some mid-week talk going on.

First, let's talk about conference ranks. Where do these teams stack up before MAC play?



1. Buffalo
2. NIU
3. Toledo
4. BGSU
5. EMU
6. CMU
7. Miami
8. Ohio
9. WMU
10. Ball State
11. Kent St
12. Akron
13. UMASS


Top 5 MAC draft players so far this season. Who are yours?

1. Harold Fannin Jr - BG (TE)
2. Antario Brown - NIU (RB)
3. JerQuan Stewart - TOL (WR)
4. Jordan Oladukon - BG (CB)
5. (TIE) Shaun Dolac - BUFF (LB)
5. (TIE) Matt Salopek - MOFO (LB)

The MAC has 13 teams. Who would you add to the MAC if you were the commissioner?

Indiana State or Rhode Island


Can't wait to read your comments. 🍻

Last Edited: 9/23/2024 3:45:24 PM by ExCat21

Back to Top
  
M.D.W.S.T
General User



Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 2,376

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 9/23/2024 7:20:17 PM 
ExCat21 wrote:


The MAC has 13 teams. Who would you add to the MAC if you were the commissioner?

Indiana State or Rhode Island


Can't wait to read your comments. 🍻



Gimme or
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 9/23/2024 8:06:55 PM 
I'll slightly update my prior Tiers:
L.C. wrote:
Tier 1: NIU, Toledo
Tier 2: Miami, BG
Tier 3: Ohio, WMU, EMU
Tier 4: Ball State, CMU, Buffalo
Tier 5: none
Tier 6: none
Tier 7: Akron, Kent, (U.Mass would go here, too)

Tier 1: none
Tier 2: Toledo, BG, NIU, Miami
Tier 3: Buffalo, EMU, Ohio, WMU
Tier 4: CMU, Ball State
Tier 5: Akron
Tier 6: UMass
Tier 7: Kent

My changes are small: I moved Toledo and NIU down a tier, and Buffalo up a tier, plus I spread out the bottom three a little.

In my opinion, when two teams in the same tier play, the home team will be a slight favorite. A team playing a team in the tier above them will be an underdog, but could win, especially if the game is at home. A team playing a team two tiers ahead is unlikely to win, but it isn't impossible.

Last Edited: 9/23/2024 8:09:18 PM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
ExCat21
General User

Member Since: 9/29/2014
Post Count: 1,089

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 9/23/2024 11:55:09 PM 
L.C. wrote:
I'll slightly update my prior Tiers:
L.C. wrote:
Tier 1: NIU, Toledo
Tier 2: Miami, BG
Tier 3: Ohio, WMU, EMU
Tier 4: Ball State, CMU, Buffalo
Tier 5: none
Tier 6: none
Tier 7: Akron, Kent, (U.Mass would go here, too)

Tier 1: none
Tier 2: Toledo, BG, NIU, Miami
Tier 3: Buffalo, EMU, Ohio, WMU
Tier 4: CMU, Ball State
Tier 5: Akron
Tier 6: UMass
Tier 7: Kent

My changes are small: I moved Toledo and NIU down a tier, and Buffalo up a tier, plus I spread out the bottom three a little.

In my opinion, when two teams in the same tier play, the home team will be a slight favorite. A team playing a team in the tier above them will be an underdog, but could win, especially if the game is at home. A team playing a team two tiers ahead is unlikely to win, but it isn't impossible.



Very interesting. Back in the day I never really considered a lot of MAC away games as true home field advantage like a P4 team. Except one place: Central Michigan. Not sure if it's how the stadium is built but the noise felt different there.

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 9/24/2024 11:10:50 AM 
Ohio certainly puts a lot of pride into "defending the Frank". At place where the attendance is in the 5-10,000 range, that is no doubt less true. As a fan, it seems to me that the Glass Bowl has been another particularly difficult place for Ohio to win. On the other hand, Buffalo going into DeKalb and winning shows that in the MAC, you should always expect the unexpected; upsets are going to happen.

Last Edited: 9/24/2024 11:30:35 AM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
SBH
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,997

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 9/24/2024 12:21:32 PM 
ExCat21 wrote:
L.C. wrote:
I'll slightly update my prior Tiers:
L.C. wrote:
Tier 1: NIU, Toledo
Tier 2: Miami, BG
Tier 3: Ohio, WMU, EMU
Tier 4: Ball State, CMU, Buffalo
Tier 5: none
Tier 6: none
Tier 7: Akron, Kent, (U.Mass would go here, too)

Tier 1: none
Tier 2: Toledo, BG, NIU, Miami
Tier 3: Buffalo, EMU, Ohio, WMU
Tier 4: CMU, Ball State
Tier 5: Akron
Tier 6: UMass
Tier 7: Kent

My changes are small: I moved Toledo and NIU down a tier, and Buffalo up a tier, plus I spread out the bottom three a little.

In my opinion, when two teams in the same tier play, the home team will be a slight favorite. A team playing a team in the tier above them will be an underdog, but could win, especially if the game is at home. A team playing a team two tiers ahead is unlikely to win, but it isn't impossible.



Very interesting. Back in the day I never really considered a lot of MAC away games as true home field advantage like a P4 team. Except one place: Central Michigan. Not sure if it's how the stadium is built but the noise felt different there.



Hard to justify Miami being Tier 1. They're 0-3 (I know) and have had a hell of a time scoring.
Back to Top
  
colobobcat66
General User

Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,400

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 9/24/2024 1:55:30 PM 
SBH wrote:
ExCat21 wrote:
L.C. wrote:
I'll slightly update my prior Tiers:
L.C. wrote:
Tier 1: NIU, Toledo
Tier 2: Miami, BG
Tier 3: Ohio, WMU, EMU
Tier 4: Ball State, CMU, Buffalo
Tier 5: none
Tier 6: none
Tier 7: Akron, Kent, (U.Mass would go here, too)

Tier 1: none
Tier 2: Toledo, BG, NIU, Miami
Tier 3: Buffalo, EMU, Ohio, WMU
Tier 4: CMU, Ball State
Tier 5: Akron
Tier 6: UMass
Tier 7: Kent

My changes are small: I moved Toledo and NIU down a tier, and Buffalo up a tier, plus I spread out the bottom three a little.

In my opinion, when two teams in the same tier play, the home team will be a slight favorite. A team playing a team in the tier above them will be an underdog, but could win, especially if the game is at home. A team playing a team two tiers ahead is unlikely to win, but it isn't impossible.



Very interesting. Back in the day I never really considered a lot of MAC away games as true home field advantage like a P4 team. Except one place: Central Michigan. Not sure if it's how the stadium is built but the noise felt different there.



Hard to justify Miami being Tier 1. They're 0-3 (I know) and have had a hell of a time scoring.


Let’s see how they do moving forward in the MAC. Their star QB is not doing well so far
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 9/24/2024 8:12:09 PM 
SBH wrote:
Hard to justify Miami being Tier 1. They're 0-3 (I know) and have had a hell of a time scoring.

No one is in Tier 1. NIU and Toledo were in Tier 1, but then they lost. I only have Miami one Tier above Ohio, and hope that I have the opportunity to reverse that before the season is over.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 9/30/2024 9:10:49 AM 
FWIW, here are the current projections from Team Rankings:
https://www.teamrankings.com/ncf/projections/standings /

Their method takes into account randomness, who each team plays, and who will have the home field in each game. Here are their early projections for final conference wins and chances of being bowl eligible:
Toledo 6-2, 99%
BG 5.9-2.1, 86%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
NIU 4.8-3.2, 94%
Miami 4.8-3.2, 58%
EMU 4.7-3.3, 93%
WMU 4.7-3.3, 56%
Buffalo 4.5-3.5, 78%
CMU 3.1-4.9, 36.3%
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1.6%
Ball St 1.5-6.5, 1.4%
Kent 1.2-6.8, 0.0%

My first takeaway is that the MAC is balanced enough that 6 conference wins may be enough to get into the playoffs.

My second takeaway is that Ohio is not favored to be in the conference playoff, but they not out of the mix. If they play well, continue to improve, stay healthy, and get some good bounces at important times, it could happen. That's pretty remarkable for a team with as much turnover as they had. On the other hand, they could fall quite a ways down the list if things don't go well.

My third takeaway from this is that some teams, such as NIU, are projected worse than you might expect due to a more difficult schedule, but Ohio's isn't too bad. They dodge both BG and NIU, and if you look at the competitive games that likely will determine whether Ohio is in the playoff game (EMU, CMU, Buffalo, and Miami), it is equally split between home and away. Ohio will likely need to win 3 of these 4 to make the playoff game.

My final takeaway is this: Now is the time! Three of those big four games are up next. Ohio needs to win at least 2 of them. If they don't, they will have to win their final four, including beating Toledo on the road.

Last Edited: 9/30/2024 9:12:47 AM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/5/2024 7:17:00 PM 
L.C. wrote:
L.C. wrote:
Tier 1: none
Tier 2: Toledo, BG, NIU, Miami
Tier 3: Buffalo, EMU, Ohio, WMU
Tier 4: CMU, Ball State
Tier 5: Akron
Tier 6: (U Mass*)
Tier 7: Kent

I'll make more small changes, at least until we get into the meat of the conference schedule. I'll move Miami down, move UMass up a notch, and Ball State down one:
Tier 1: none
Tier 2: Toledo, BG, NIU
Tier 3: Buffalo, Miami, Ohio, WMU, EMU
Tier 4: CMU
Tier 5: Akron, Ball State, (U Mass*)
Tier 6: none
Tier 7: Kent

* Not officially in the MAC yet

More minor adjustments. BG and WMU down.
Tier 1: none
Tier 2: Toledo, NIU
Tier 3: BG, Buffalo, Miami, Ohio, EMU
Tier 4: CMU, WMU
Tier 5: Akron, Ball State, (U Mass*)
Tier 6: none
Tier 7: Kent

Next week we get four games that will help to break up the big cluster at Tier 3:
Miami at EMU (Tier 3 at Tier 3)
Ohio at CMU (Tier 3 at Tier 4)
Toledo at Buffalo (Tier 2 at Tier 3)
NIU at BG (Tier 2 at Tier 3)
In all cases, the team I have in the higher Tier is on the road, so to me, all these games could go either way.



“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Victory
General User

Member Since: 3/10/2012
Post Count: 2,246

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/6/2024 11:16:35 AM 
L.C. wrote:
FWIW, here are the current projections from Team Rankings:
https://www.teamrankings.com/ncf/projections/standings /

Their method takes into account randomness, who each team plays, and who will have the home field in each game. Here are their early projections for final conference wins and chances of being bowl eligible:
Toledo 6-2, 99%
BG 5.9-2.1, 86%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
NIU 4.8-3.2, 94%
Miami 4.8-3.2, 58%
EMU 4.7-3.3, 93%
WMU 4.7-3.3, 56%
Buffalo 4.5-3.5, 78%
CMU 3.1-4.9, 36.3%
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1.6%
Ball St 1.5-6.5, 1.4%
Kent 1.2-6.8, 0.0%

My first takeaway is that the MAC is balanced enough that 6 conference wins may be enough to get into the playoffs.

My second takeaway is that Ohio is not favored to be in the conference playoff, but they not out of the mix. If they play well, continue to improve, stay healthy, and get some good bounces at important times, it could happen. That's pretty remarkable for a team with as much turnover as they had. On the other hand, they could fall quite a ways down the list if things don't go well.

My third takeaway from this is that some teams, such as NIU, are projected worse than you might expect due to a more difficult schedule, but Ohio's isn't too bad. They dodge both BG and NIU, and if you look at the competitive games that likely will determine whether Ohio is in the playoff game (EMU, CMU, Buffalo, and Miami), it is equally split between home and away. Ohio will likely need to win 3 of these 4 to make the playoff game.

My final takeaway is this: Now is the time! Three of those big four games are up next. Ohio needs to win at least 2 of them. If they don't, they will have to win their final four, including beating Toledo on the road.


I think if we can get healthier then the though of making the MAC Championship isn't that far out there. My hope was we could see improvement as the year went on. We look better at this point than I thought we would even with the injuries.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/6/2024 2:23:12 PM 
L.C. wrote:
Toledo 6-2, 99%
BG 5.9-2.1, 86%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
NIU 4.8-3.2, 94%
Miami 4.8-3.2, 58%
EMU 4.7-3.3, 93%
WMU 4.7-3.3, 56%
Buffalo 4.5-3.5, 78%
CMU 3.1-4.9, 36.3%
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1.6%
Ball St 1.5-6.5, 1.4%
Kent 1.2-6.8, 0.0%

No upsets, so not much change this week from TeamRankings, which is still predicting a Toledo-BG championship game, with Toledo-Ohio as the next most likely game:
Toledo 6.3-1.7, 99.6% +.3
BG 5.9-2.1, 87.3%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
WMU 4.9-3.1, 61.6% +.2
EMU 4.8-3.2, 94% +.1

NIU 4.6-3.4, 93.7% -.2
Miami 4.6-3.4, 53.4% -.2
Buffalo 4.4-3.6, 73.6% -.1
CMU 3.2-4.8, 38.1% +.1
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1%
Ball St 1.4-6.6, 0.6% -.1
Kent 1.1-6.9, 0.0% -.1


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
M.D.W.S.T
General User



Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 2,376

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/7/2024 10:08:22 AM 
Tier 1:
Toledo

Tier 2: No one

Tier 3:
EMU
NIU
OU
CMU (we'll see this week)
Buffalo (trending down)
BG (trending down)


Tier 4:
WMU
Miami (worst offense in the MAC - did not see that coming)(still make me nervous)

ASS:
Ball State
Akron
Kent State
Back to Top
  
ExCat21
General User

Member Since: 9/29/2014
Post Count: 1,089

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/8/2024 4:18:18 PM 
L.C. wrote:
L.C. wrote:
Toledo 6-2, 99%
BG 5.9-2.1, 86%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
NIU 4.8-3.2, 94%
Miami 4.8-3.2, 58%
EMU 4.7-3.3, 93%
WMU 4.7-3.3, 56%
Buffalo 4.5-3.5, 78%
CMU 3.1-4.9, 36.3%
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1.6%
Ball St 1.5-6.5, 1.4%
Kent 1.2-6.8, 0.0%

No upsets, so not much change this week from TeamRankings, which is still predicting a Toledo-BG championship game, with Toledo-Ohio as the next most likely game:
Toledo 6.3-1.7, 99.6% +.3
BG 5.9-2.1, 87.3%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
WMU 4.9-3.1, 61.6% +.2
EMU 4.8-3.2, 94% +.1

NIU 4.6-3.4, 93.7% -.2
Miami 4.6-3.4, 53.4% -.2
Buffalo 4.4-3.6, 73.6% -.1
CMU 3.2-4.8, 38.1% +.1
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1%
Ball St 1.4-6.6, 0.6% -.1
Kent 1.1-6.9, 0.0% -.1


All eyes on BG/NIU and Toledo/Buffs. Things could get really muddy with Buffalo and BG winning.
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,249

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/9/2024 2:31:11 PM 
ExCat21 wrote:
L.C. wrote:
L.C. wrote:
Toledo 6-2, 99%
BG 5.9-2.1, 86%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
NIU 4.8-3.2, 94%
Miami 4.8-3.2, 58%
EMU 4.7-3.3, 93%
WMU 4.7-3.3, 56%
Buffalo 4.5-3.5, 78%
CMU 3.1-4.9, 36.3%
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1.6%
Ball St 1.5-6.5, 1.4%
Kent 1.2-6.8, 0.0%

No upsets, so not much change this week from TeamRankings, which is still predicting a Toledo-BG championship game, with Toledo-Ohio as the next most likely game:
Toledo 6.3-1.7, 99.6% +.3
BG 5.9-2.1, 87.3%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
WMU 4.9-3.1, 61.6% +.2
EMU 4.8-3.2, 94% +.1

NIU 4.6-3.4, 93.7% -.2
Miami 4.6-3.4, 53.4% -.2
Buffalo 4.4-3.6, 73.6% -.1
CMU 3.2-4.8, 38.1% +.1
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1%
Ball St 1.4-6.6, 0.6% -.1
Kent 1.1-6.9, 0.0% -.1


All eyes on BG/NIU and Toledo/Buffs. Things could get really muddy with Buffalo and BG winning.


In mind BG over NIU is a possibility; Buffs beating Toledo is as likely as Vanderbilt beating Alabama! ;-)


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
Victory
General User

Member Since: 3/10/2012
Post Count: 2,246

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/9/2024 7:58:10 PM 
OhioCatFan wrote:

In mind BG over NIU is a possibility; Buffs beating Toledo is as likely as Vanderbilt beating Alabama! ;-)


Bowling Green is a 3 point favorite.
Back to Top
  
ExCat21
General User

Member Since: 9/29/2014
Post Count: 1,089

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/12/2024 3:38:47 PM 
OhioCatFan wrote:
ExCat21 wrote:
L.C. wrote:
L.C. wrote:
Toledo 6-2, 99%
BG 5.9-2.1, 86%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
NIU 4.8-3.2, 94%
Miami 4.8-3.2, 58%
EMU 4.7-3.3, 93%
WMU 4.7-3.3, 56%
Buffalo 4.5-3.5, 78%
CMU 3.1-4.9, 36.3%
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1.6%
Ball St 1.5-6.5, 1.4%
Kent 1.2-6.8, 0.0%

No upsets, so not much change this week from TeamRankings, which is still predicting a Toledo-BG championship game, with Toledo-Ohio as the next most likely game:
Toledo 6.3-1.7, 99.6% +.3
BG 5.9-2.1, 87.3%
Ohio 5.1-2.9, 89%
WMU 4.9-3.1, 61.6% +.2
EMU 4.8-3.2, 94% +.1

NIU 4.6-3.4, 93.7% -.2
Miami 4.6-3.4, 53.4% -.2
Buffalo 4.4-3.6, 73.6% -.1
CMU 3.2-4.8, 38.1% +.1
Akron 1.8-6.2, 1%
Ball St 1.4-6.6, 0.6% -.1
Kent 1.1-6.9, 0.0% -.1


All eyes on BG/NIU and Toledo/Buffs. Things could get really muddy with Buffalo and BG winning.


In mind BG over NIU is a possibility; Buffs beating Toledo is as likely as Vanderbilt beating Alabama! ;-)


Down goes Bama....I mean Toledo. 🤭 Couldn't stop the run today at all. Henderson almost had 150 rushing today. Meanwhile, Toledo has a very capable back up QB in John Richter. Very efficient in Rockets comeback attempt.

All eyes on BG/NIU and OU/CMU.

Slight breakdown of these games:

NIU - 2nd offense , 1st defense in MAC
BG - 3rd offense, 8th defense in MAC

OU - 5th offense, 2nd defense in MAC
CMU - 1st offense, 4th defense in MAC
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/13/2024 12:07:50 AM 
Buffalo jumps 2 spots, BG, WMU, EMU and Ball State each down one

Tier 1: Buffalo
Tier 2: Toledo, NIU
Tier 3: BG, Miami, Ohio
Tier 4: CMU, WMU, EMU
Tier 5: Akron, (U Mass*)
Tier 6: Ball St
Tier 7: Kent

If Ohio can find a way to win at Miami, we could see 3-0 Ohio against 3-0 Buffalo in a couple weeks. That's definitely not the battle for the top of the MAC than anyone expected....

Edit - latest from TeamRankings
While I wasn't willing to move Ohio up to Tier 2 (because of the 2d half), apparently TeamRankings is. Here is their current projections for the MAC
Columns are Conference wins, bowl eligible %, MACC % chance:

Buffalo 5.8, 97.0%, 12.1%
Ohio 5.5, 96.1%, 10.9%
NIU 5.4, 99.3%, 20.1%
Miami 5.4, 79.9%, 16.5%
Toledo 5.3, 98.6%, 19.4%
BG 5.2, 74.0%, 11.2%
WMU 5.1, 67.4%, 7.1%
EMU 3.9, 85.2%, 2.3%
CMU 2.7, 23.7%, 0.4%
Ball St 1.6, 0.4%, 0.0%
Akron 1.5, 0.2%, 0.0%
Kent 0.6, 0.0%, 0.0%

Judging from their picks, they have Buffalo a bit above everyone else, then it is pretty even from Ohio all the way to WMU, with any of the top 7 still capable of winning the MACC. Now that's a balanced conference! No other conference has more than 4 teams with a 7% or better chance of a conference championship, and the MAC has 7. https://www.teamrankings.com/ncf/projections/standings /

Now it's time for Ohio to prove they belong in Tier 2 or higher. Ohio just needs to keep improving a little bit each game, and they can do this.

Last Edited: 10/13/2024 9:09:38 AM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Victory
General User

Member Since: 3/10/2012
Post Count: 2,246

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/13/2024 12:17:15 PM 
L.C. wrote:
Buffalo jumps 2 spots, BG, WMU, EMU and Ball State each down one

Tier 1: Buffalo
Tier 2: Toledo, NIU
Tier 3: BG, Miami, Ohio
Tier 4: CMU, WMU, EMU
Tier 5: Akron, (U Mass*)
Tier 6: Ball St
Tier 7: Kent

If Ohio can find a way to win at Miami, we could see 3-0 Ohio against 3-0 Buffalo in a couple weeks. That's definitely not the battle for the top of the MAC than anyone expected....

Edit - latest from TeamRankings
While I wasn't willing to move Ohio up to Tier 2 (because of the 2d half), apparently TeamRankings is. Here is their current projections for the MAC
Columns are Conference wins, bowl eligible %, MACC % chance:

Buffalo 5.8, 97.0%, 12.1%
Ohio 5.5, 96.1%, 10.9%
NIU 5.4, 99.3%, 20.1%
Miami 5.4, 79.9%, 16.5%
Toledo 5.3, 98.6%, 19.4%
BG 5.2, 74.0%, 11.2%
WMU 5.1, 67.4%, 7.1%
EMU 3.9, 85.2%, 2.3%
CMU 2.7, 23.7%, 0.4%
Ball St 1.6, 0.4%, 0.0%
Akron 1.5, 0.2%, 0.0%
Kent 0.6, 0.0%, 0.0%

Judging from their picks, they have Buffalo a bit above everyone else, then it is pretty even from Ohio all the way to WMU, with any of the top 7 still capable of winning the MACC. Now that's a balanced conference! No other conference has more than 4 teams with a 7% or better chance of a conference championship, and the MAC has 7. https://www.teamrankings.com/ncf/projections/standings /

Now it's time for Ohio to prove they belong in Tier 2 or higher. Ohio just needs to keep improving a little bit each game, and they can do this.


I basically agree with this. I am not sure that the oddsmakers as of yet actually would consider Buffalo a better tram than Toledo and NIU but they have already beaten both of them, and I'm pretty sure those are the three best teams, so they should be #1. In the same way Ohio has 4 total wins and is 2-0 in conference so we deserve credit for actual wins but we would definitely be an underdog to Miami and BG on a neutral field. I'm not sure that WMU shouldn't be here too with too conference wins but their wins don't look that great.

My biggest nitpick is CMU should be worse than WMU and EMU but, OK, still better than the others so unless you wanted to make a tier just for them I guess I can't argue.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/13/2024 5:53:26 PM 
Victory wrote:
...My biggest nitpick is CMU should be worse than WMU and EMU but, OK, still better than the others so unless you wanted to make a tier just for them I guess I can't argue.

Until they play, it's hard to know. WMU only has wins against terrible teams, and all are closer than they should be. By contrast EMU has a "quality" win against Jacksonville State, and CMU has a "quality" win against SDSU.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
M.D.W.S.T
General User



Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 2,376

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/14/2024 8:54:03 AM 
M.D.W.S.T wrote:
Tier 1:
Toledo

Tier 2: No one

Tier 3:
EMU
NIU
OU
CMU (we'll see this week)
Buffalo (trending down)
BG (trending down)


Tier 4:
WMU
Miami (worst offense in the MAC - did not see that coming)(still make me nervous)

ASS:
Ball State
Akron
Kent State


Tier 1:
No one (Likely still Toledo)

Tier 2:
Buffalo
Toledo

Tier 3:
OU
EMU
NIU
Miami (Might have figured out they shouldn't suck)

Tier 4:
CMU
WMU

ASS:
Bowling Green
Ball State
Akron
Kent State

Back to Top
  
ExCat21
General User

Member Since: 9/29/2014
Post Count: 1,089

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/14/2024 10:11:53 AM 
M.D.W.S.T wrote:
M.D.W.S.T wrote:
Tier 1:
Toledo

Tier 2: No one

Tier 3:
EMU
NIU
OU
CMU (we'll see this week)
Buffalo (trending down)
BG (trending down)


Tier 4:
WMU
Miami (worst offense in the MAC - did not see that coming)(still make me nervous)

ASS:
Ball State
Akron
Kent State


Tier 1:
No one (Likely still Toledo)

Tier 2:
Buffalo
Toledo

Tier 3:
OU
EMU
NIU
Miami (Might have figured out they shouldn't suck)

Tier 4:
CMU
WMU

ASS:
Bowling Green
Ball State
Akron
Kent State



My new ranks for the week:

1. Buffalo
2. NIU
3. Ohio
4. Toledo
5. Miami
6. EMU
7. BGSU
8. WMU
9. CMU
10. Ball State
11. Kent St
12. Akron
13. UMASS


Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/20/2024 6:56:48 PM 
I really don't know what to do with these, now. I'll drop Buffalo 2 ranks, and raise WMU, U.Mass, Ball State, and Kent 1 each. It's starting to look like a normal distribution:

Tier 1:
Tier 2: Toledo, NIU
Tier 3: BG, Miami, Ohio, Buffalo, WMU
Tier 4: CMU, EMU, (U. Mass)
Tier 5: Akron, Ball St
Tier 6: Kent
Tier 7:


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
colobobcat66
General User

Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,400

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/20/2024 9:19:36 PM 
L.C. wrote:
I really don't know what to do with these, now. I'll drop Buffalo 2 ranks, and raise WMU, U.Mass, Ball State, and Kent 1 each. It's starting to look like a normal distribution:

Tier 1:
Tier 2: Toledo, NIU
Tier 3: BG, Miami, Ohio, Buffalo, WMU
Tier 4: CMU, EMU, (U. Mass)
Tier 5: Akron, Ball St
Tier 6: Kent
Tier 7:


It seems like Buffalo with wins over your 2 top Tier teams would be in that tier.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,397

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Conference ranks
   Posted: 10/21/2024 7:27:26 AM 
colobobcat66 wrote:
L.C. wrote:
I really don't know what to do with these, now. I'll drop Buffalo 2 ranks, and raise WMU, U.Mass, Ball State, and Kent 1 each. It's starting to look like a normal distribution:

Tier 1:
Tier 2: Toledo, NIU
Tier 3: BG, Miami, Ohio, Buffalo, WMU
Tier 4: CMU, EMU, (U. Mass)
Tier 5: Akron, Ball St
Tier 6: Kent
Tier 7:


It seems like Buffalo with wins over your 2 top Tier teams would be in that tier.

And that unpredictability and disorder is what makes the MAC the MAC. I expected Buffalo to easily beat WMU, but no. I guess I could have left Buffalo even with Toledo and NIU, and moved WMU all the way to the top, but I am skeptical. After all, WMU was trailing Ball State after 3 quarters, and was being blown out by Akron until a freak hailstorm covered the field in ball bearings, and led to repeated Akron turnovers.

If WMU crushes Kent this week and beats NIU next week, I'll be a believer, and move them to Tier 1. If Buffalo blows out Ohio this week, I will move them back up to Tier 1 or 2. In the meantime, I don't know what to believe, so I have clustered almost everyone between Tier 2 and Tier 4.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 25  of 34 Posts
Jump to Page:  1 | 2    Next >
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties