Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Fans by geography
Page: 1 of 1
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,387
AS
mail
Alan Swank
Came across this interactive map today. It's very interesting. Click on 45701.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/03/upshot/nca...
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/16/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
RF
mail
Robert Fox
What's interesting to me is the somewhat consistent contrarian vote in many of the districts. In Columbus, fair number of Michigan fans. In Ann Arbor, fair number of Ohio State fans. In Knoxville, fair number of Florida fans, etc. These are the folks who just hate their neighbors. "Hello neighbor! Who do you root for?" "Anyone who is playing you."

Also curious how this research was done. My old home turf shows to be 52% Ohio State fans. I did not have that feeling growing up there.
Last Edited: 1/2/2020 1:08:36 PM by Robert Fox
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,615
mail
The Optimist
What's the data pulled from?

I've seen crazier things happen.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,732
BLSS
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
What's the data pulled from?
It's based on Facebook likes.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 8/31/2005
Post Count: 10,595
LC
mail
L.C.
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Came across this interactive map today. It's very interesting. Click on 45701.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/03/upshot/nca...

I'm sure this was posted to BA back in 2014. Ohio fares far better on this chart than any of the other MAC teams. I doubt they do as well today, and the attendance decline reflects that.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus
Last Edited: 1/2/2020 4:49:47 PM by L.C.
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,717
mail
Andrew Ruck
The analysis is very very cool. However, it is definitely flawed. Not only is it 5+ years old...It being derived from facebook likes is far from a perfect methodology. Some team fb pages are super interactive and a fun follow...others are dead. Also some fan bases are more likely to be into facebook than others. I would say these numbers would slant higher to the elite programs with a whole department running their facebook page. If you went door to door, I think mid-major programs like Ohio would have higher numbers than this analysis.

Sidebar...I was shocked to see Wisconsin owns the twin cities area and the eastern half of Minnesota.

Andrew Ruck
B.B.A. 2003
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,615
mail
The Optimist
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
The analysis is very very cool. However, it is definitely flawed. Not only is it 5+ years old...It being derived from facebook likes is far from a perfect methodology. Some team fb pages are super interactive and a fun follow...others are dead. Also some fan bases are more likely to be into facebook than others. I would say these numbers would slant higher to the elite programs with a whole department running their facebook page. If you went door to door, I think mid-major programs like Ohio would have higher numbers than this analysis.

Sidebar...I was shocked to see Wisconsin owns the twin cities area and the eastern half of Minnesota.
Went and looked at Minnesota... Towards the middle of the state, west of St Cloud, the most popular team is... Oregon? Someone will need to explain that to me.

Definitely an interesting graphic although Facebook likes is by no means perfect judge of reality.

I've seen crazier things happen.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 8/31/2005
Post Count: 10,595
LC
mail
L.C.
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
The analysis is very very cool. However, it is definitely flawed. Not only is it 5+ years old...It being derived from facebook likes is far from a perfect methodology. Some team fb pages are super interactive and a fun follow...others are dead. Also some fan bases are more likely to be into facebook than others. I would say these numbers would slant higher to the elite programs with a whole department running their facebook page. If you went door to door, I think mid-major programs like Ohio would have higher numbers than this analysis.

Sidebar...I was shocked to see Wisconsin owns the twin cities area and the eastern half of Minnesota.
Went and looked at Minnesota... Towards the middle of the state, west of St Cloud, the most popular team is... Oregon? Someone will need to explain that to me.

Definitely an interesting graphic although Facebook likes is by no means perfect judge of reality.

It is easy to explain Oregon's presence in many strange areas. Oregon was very successful from 2008-14, and played in a couple of National Championship Games (2010, 2014). They were perceived as an outsider. People love underdogs. This chart is from they year of one of their appearances in the National Championship Game, and it isn't a current chart. In the years from 2016-8 they were not as good, plus they are not really as much of an "outsider" anymore.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus
Last Edited: 1/3/2020 1:07:48 PM by L.C.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,615
mail
The Optimist
L.C. wrote:expand_more
The analysis is very very cool. However, it is definitely flawed. Not only is it 5+ years old...It being derived from facebook likes is far from a perfect methodology. Some team fb pages are super interactive and a fun follow...others are dead. Also some fan bases are more likely to be into facebook than others. I would say these numbers would slant higher to the elite programs with a whole department running their facebook page. If you went door to door, I think mid-major programs like Ohio would have higher numbers than this analysis.

Sidebar...I was shocked to see Wisconsin owns the twin cities area and the eastern half of Minnesota.
Went and looked at Minnesota... Towards the middle of the state, west of St Cloud, the most popular team is... Oregon? Someone will need to explain that to me.

Definitely an interesting graphic although Facebook likes is by no means perfect judge of reality.

It is easy to explain Oregon's presence in many strange areas. Oregon was very successful from 2008-14, and played in a couple of National Championship Games (2010, 2014). They were perceived as an outsider. People love underdogs. This chart is from they year of one of their appearances in the National Championship Game, and it isn't a current chart. In the years from 2016-8 they were not as good, plus they are not really as much of an "outsider" anymore.

That seems obvious now that you say it, I was completely thinking about it from geography perspective.

I've seen crazier things happen.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,387
AS
mail
Alan Swank
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
The analysis is very very cool. However, it is definitely flawed. Not only is it 5+ years old...It being derived from facebook likes is far from a perfect methodology. Some team fb pages are super interactive and a fun follow...others are dead. Also some fan bases are more likely to be into facebook than others. I would say these numbers would slant higher to the elite programs with a whole department running their facebook page. If you went door to door, I think mid-major programs like Ohio would have higher numbers than this analysis.

Sidebar...I was shocked to see Wisconsin owns the twin cities area and the eastern half of Minnesota.
Went and looked at Minnesota... Towards the middle of the state, west of St Cloud, the most popular team is... Oregon? Someone will need to explain that to me.

Definitely an interesting graphic although Facebook likes is by no means perfect judge of reality.

It is easy to explain Oregon's presence in many strange areas. Oregon was very successful from 2008-14, and played in a couple of National Championship Games (2010, 2014). They were perceived as an outsider. People love underdogs. This chart is from they year of one of their appearances in the National Championship Game, and it isn't a current chart. In the years from 2016-8 they were not as good, plus they are not really as much of an "outsider" anymore.

That seems obvious now that you say it, I was completely thinking about it from geography perspective.
And to take it a step further, I'd bet the current map would show much more Clemson penetration that before particularly in the SE. Regardless, it's an interesting set of data points.
Showing Messages: 1 - 10 of 10
MAC News Links
Saturday,
Who's Online

There are 58 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com

58 Guests