Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  Bill Connelly Preseason Analysis

Topic:  Bill Connelly Preseason Analysis
Author
Message
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,067

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  Bill Connelly Preseason Analysis
   Posted: 5/18/2019 11:39:25 AM 
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2019/2/11/18219...

His top MAC Teams:
WMU 33.2 offense(39th) 33.7 defense(100th) -.5 Net
NIU 18.9 Offense(120th) 19.5 defense(19th) -.6 Net
Toledo 33.8 Offense(33rd) 35.0 defense(107th) -1.3 Net
Ohio 33.7 Offense (34th) 35.6 defense(109th) -1.9 Net
Miami 25.7 Offense(93rd) 20.0 defense(82d) -4.9 Net
EMU 23.6 Offense(106th) 29.7 defense(79th) -6.4 Net
Buffalo 26.7 Offense(88th) 33.7 defense(99th) -7.0 Net
Then he sees a big gap to Ball State -12.9, Kent -13.7, CMU -18.5, BG -19.4, and Akron -19.9.

Ohio's OOC foes are:
Pitt +3.8
Marshall -1.2
ULL -7.2

I find it interesting that Connelly is projecting Ohio to have one of the best G5 offenses in the country, despite the loss of OUellette, Irons, White, Lowery, Anderson, Wood, C. Brown, and Meyer. I also find it interesting that he is projecting Ohio to have one of the worst defenses in the MAC, despite returning most everyone except the DTs, Nelson, and Croutch.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Rufusbobcat94
General User

Member Since: 6/13/2018
Post Count: 342

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Bill Connelly Preseason Analysis
   Posted: 5/18/2019 8:50:15 PM 
L.C. wrote:
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2019/2/11/18219...

His top MAC Teams:
WMU 33.2 offense(39th) 33.7 defense(100th) -.5 Net
NIU 18.9 Offense(120th) 19.5 defense(19th) -.6 Net
Toledo 33.8 Offense(33rd) 35.0 defense(107th) -1.3 Net
Ohio 33.7 Offense (34th) 35.6 defense(109th) -1.9 Net
Miami 25.7 Offense(93rd) 20.0 defense(82d) -4.9 Net
EMU 23.6 Offense(106th) 29.7 defense(79th) -6.4 Net
Buffalo 26.7 Offense(88th) 33.7 defense(99th) -7.0 Net
Then he sees a big gap to Ball State -12.9, Kent -13.7, CMU -18.5, BG -19.4, and Akron -19.9.

Ohio's OOC foes are:
Pitt +3.8
Marshall -1.2
ULL -7.2

I find it interesting that Connelly is projecting Ohio to have one of the best G5 offenses in the country, despite the loss of OUellette, Irons, White, Lowery, Anderson, Wood, C. Brown, and Meyer. I also find it interesting that he is projecting Ohio to have one of the worst defenses in the MAC, despite returning most everyone except the DTs, Nelson, and Croutch.



Yeah, good questions I think he comes closer to getting the offense right than the defense. I don't see how they can run the all same concepts in the running game without Lowery and Anderson (like pulling the left side) and the experience at RB especially is lacking. But I think with Rourke you have one of the best QBs in Ohio history. And the Offensive line has more questions than last year but a strong, experienced starting four of five with dudes like Plesants, Kitrell, Hayes, Meservy. And WR is poised to make a big jump with the experience from Odom, and the new, explosive guys like Buckner and Cox.

I think the defense has the talent to be significantly better than the number Connelly lists. Ohio has the potential to have the best secondary in the MAC as well as the best DE rotation. Javon Hagan will have +6 ints this year and is probably a day 2 NFL selection barring injury.

Ogun-Semore is poised for a breakout year- I cant remember seeing a guy his age with his motor. OS is relentless. And they have a MLB who is really starting to get it. I think that is enough to get things done. There are questions on the outside at linebacker and at DT especially. One SR we lost I would add to your list is Tyler Gullett-he came in during the MAC schedule and really helped solidify the LB corps.

My biggest concern on the team is RB or DT. Cole Baker can be a rotational DT on a MAC Championship team. As can Brian Arp. Either one of those two will have to elevate their game to be the impact guy. If not Arp or Baker, I think there might be an answer on the roster, depending how they approach the offseason. If I am the coaching staff, getting the best out of K Caesar is one of my top priorities. Hopefully he is hitting the offseason conditioning program like he intends to win starter's minutes. He has good quickness for his size and is a competitor but would be more effective by being lighter and more stronger?

Last Edited: 5/18/2019 8:55:45 PM by Rufusbobcat94

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,067

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Bill Connelly Preseason Analysis
   Posted: 5/18/2019 9:53:01 PM 
Rufusbobcat94 wrote:
..
Yeah, good questions I think he comes closer to getting the offense right than the defense. ...

Connelly has a very good track record, so far be it for me to say he's wrong. I was just pointing out that it was different than my forecast. I expected a drop in the offense, but the defense to be better. He may be factoring in a negative adjustment for the change in the coaching staff.

In an earlier thread, I said:
L.C. wrote:
..the other top teams in the MAC mostly look to be having an off year next year. Buffalo, who would have been Ohio's key threat, was hit heavily by transfers. Miami, Ohio's other threat, lost their QB, and also will have to come to Athens this time. Meanwhile, the West appears to be heading towards increased parity. I expect NIU Toledo, and EMU to all be a shade worse next year, while WMU, Ball State, and CMU all improve.

Of the teams I projected to improve, BG, CMU, Ball State, Kent, and WMU, Connelly also projected all to improve. Overall we are in mostly agreement on eight of the teams, and the four where we differ the most are:
Ohio - I showed them down on offense, up on defense, net down slightly. He shows them down on offense, and down on defense, so net, down a lot
EIU - I show them down slightly, he shows them down a fair amount
Akron - I show them down a lot as they adjust to a new coaching staff, and shift away from a reliance on JUCOs and transfers, he shows them mostly sideways
NIU - I show them down slightly, he shows them up slightly, perhaps showing an effect from recent transfers.

Both of us agree that there will be more parity in the MAC this year, as most of the top teams get worse, and most of the bottom teams get better.

Last Edited: 5/19/2019 12:47:57 PM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,067

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Bill Connelly Preseason Analysis
   Posted: 5/20/2019 4:04:04 PM 
Here is another piece of his analysis, the number he calls "returning production". Rather than just using the simpler "returning starters", he calculates how productive each player is, and what percentage return.
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2019/1/31/18204...

TO see if I understand his method, I compared his final numbers for 2018:
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa
To the preseason numbers at the link in the first post on this thread. The following chart shows the Production returning for offense, and the change he projects from end 2018 to start 2019

Offensive production returning:
Kent State: return 86%, change from 2018 to 2019 +4.1
WMU 84% +3.4
CMU 83% +4.7
BG 71% +2.8
Akron 67% +2.5
Ball St 66% +1.0
NIU 64% -.2
Miami (Oh) 57% -1.1
EMU 53% -2.3
Toledo 50% -1.4
Ohio 41% -4.5
Buffalo 40% -4.6

There is clearly correlation, but he is including some other unknown factors as well. For example, why is Toledo's offense not projected to fall as much as EMU, even though EMU has more returning production? Why is CMU projected to improve the most, even though Kent and WMU have more returning production?

Now the same thing for Defense:
WMU 85% +3.7
Ball St 84% +3.8
NIU 75% +1.3
Kent St 73% +2.0
Ohio 63% -.6
Toledo 57% -.6
Miami (Oh) 57% -1.6
EMU 49% -3.6
Buffalo 46% -3.8
Akron 44% -3.3
BG 42% -3.0
CMU 40% -3.5

Again, there is correlation, but some numbers that obviously include other factors. Perhaps NIU didn't improve much because they were already really good? Why did Akron, BG, and CMU not drop as much as EMU and Buffalo? I have no idea.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Diamond Cat
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 808

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Bill Connelly Preseason Analysis
   Posted: 5/20/2019 7:30:11 PM 
I have to say I have the same concern on the other side of the ball for 2019. Last year we had to replace the defensive front 7 basically. This year we have to replace arguably the best guard-tackle left side I can remember along with AJ (legend), Irons, White, etc.

I am still in disbelief Lowery wasn't drafted. I looked back on some of the pre-season and in season discussions on him. They must have been wrong as well because he was highly rated by some.

I hope he makes the Bears.
Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 5  of 5 Posts
Jump to Page:  1
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             





Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties