Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board
BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  Concussions

Topic:  Concussions
Author
Message
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,067

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  Concussions
   Posted: 4/22/2017 8:24:02 AM 
Youth flag football is increasing dramatically as parents opt for it instead of tackle football in an effort to avoid concussions:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-flag-football-popul...

A new Iowa study shows did not show that flag football is safer:
https://now.uiowa.edu/2017/02/ui-study-youth-flag-football

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
colobobcat66
General User

Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,158

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Concussions
   Posted: 4/22/2017 6:12:05 PM 
Okay, I'll bite. It just doesn't make any sense to me that there is no difference in head injuries and that there are more injuries overall in flag FB.

Any ideas why that's true? I'm assuming everything was done right and it's statistically valid, etc.

Addendum: I just read some of the discussions about these results and they define injuries as any time a player missed playing. Some suggest that the flag players are more apt to miss playing and therefore being considered "injured" because of more intense injury concerns of their parents. Also, we're talking about 3% of the 3,800 players as being injured-114 players.

Last Edited: 4/22/2017 6:26:40 PM by colobobcat66
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,067

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Concussions
   Posted: 4/22/2017 6:17:52 PM 
colobobcat66 wrote:
Okay, I'll bite. It just doesn't make any sense to me that there is no difference in head injuries and that there are more injuries overall in flag FB.

Any ideas why that's true? I'm assuming everything was done right and it's statistically valid, etc.

No, sorry. My first thought is that is that it's a small sample. Other than that, maybe we need to be careful with all collision sports involving young people, and that presumably would include not only flag football, but could also include soccer, rugby, lacrosse, oh, and, um, pillow fights.

colobobcat66 wrote:
...Addendum: I just read some of the discussions about these results and they define injuries as any time a player missed playing. Some suggest that the flag players are more apt to miss playing and therefore being considered "injured" because of more intense injury concerns of their parents. Also, we're talking about 3% of the 3,800 players as being injured-114 players.

That would affect the overall injury rate, but not the concussion rate. Either there is a concussion or there isn't. You don't hold them out for other reasons, then conclude they had a concussion.

Last Edited: 4/22/2017 7:56:48 PM by L.C.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
colobobcat66
General User

Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,158

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Concussions
   Posted: 4/22/2017 9:05:06 PM 
L.C. wrote:
colobobcat66 wrote:
Okay, I'll bite. It just doesn't make any sense to me that there is no difference in head injuries and that there are more injuries overall in flag FB.

Any ideas why that's true? I'm assuming everything was done right and it's statistically valid, etc.

No, sorry. My first thought is that is that it's a small sample. Other than that, maybe we need to be careful with all collision sports involving young people, and that presumably would include not only flag football, but could also include soccer, rugby, lacrosse, oh, and, um, pillow fights.

colobobcat66 wrote:
...Addendum: I just read some of the discussions about these results and they define injuries as any time a player missed playing. Some suggest that the flag players are more apt to miss playing and therefore being considered "injured" because of more intense injury concerns of their parents. Also, we're talking about 3% of the 3,800 players as being injured-114 players.

That would affect the overall injury rate, but not the concussion rate. Either there is a concussion or there isn't. You don't hold them out for other reasons, then conclude they had a concussion.


You're right about the concussion issue, but they don't say in the raw results how many concussions were even talking about. I'll say this, if you dealing with a sport that involves players hitting each other or hitting inanimate objects while running, there may be injuries including concussions . Parents and players need to be aware of the risks and act accordingly. Let's hope studies continue ,and improvements in preventing or reducing them continue.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,067

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Concussions
   Posted: 4/22/2017 11:06:39 PM 
I'm in favor of that, and extending the studies to all contact sports.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 9,480

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Concussions
   Posted: 4/24/2017 4:08:14 PM 
colobobcat66 wrote:
L.C. wrote:
colobobcat66 wrote:
Okay, I'll bite. It just doesn't make any sense to me that there is no difference in head injuries and that there are more injuries overall in flag FB.

Any ideas why that's true? I'm assuming everything was done right and it's statistically valid, etc.

No, sorry. My first thought is that is that it's a small sample. Other than that, maybe we need to be careful with all collision sports involving young people, and that presumably would include not only flag football, but could also include soccer, rugby, lacrosse, oh, and, um, pillow fights.

colobobcat66 wrote:
...Addendum: I just read some of the discussions about these results and they define injuries as any time a player missed playing. Some suggest that the flag players are more apt to miss playing and therefore being considered "injured" because of more intense injury concerns of their parents. Also, we're talking about 3% of the 3,800 players as being injured-114 players.

That would affect the overall injury rate, but not the concussion rate. Either there is a concussion or there isn't. You don't hold them out for other reasons, then conclude they had a concussion.


You're right about the concussion issue, but they don't say in the raw results how many concussions were even talking about. I'll say this, if you dealing with a sport that involves players hitting each other or hitting inanimate objects while running, there may be injuries including concussions . Parents and players need to be aware of the risks and act accordingly. Let's hope studies continue ,and improvements in preventing or reducing them continue.



They also still fail to deal with the issue of the roils and synthetic hormones these athletes take that have known psychological effects.
Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 6  of 6 Posts
Jump to Page:  1
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             



WHO'S ONLINE
There are 149 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com
149 Guests
0 Registered Users
There are no other users looking at this page.


Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties