Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
General Ohio University Discussion/Alumni Events
Topic:  RE: Nice Benghazi

Topic:  RE: Nice Benghazi
Author
Message
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 4:10:21 AM 
we'd be slamming the hell out of the Dems if they'd've nominated someone like Trump.

it's not about there being questions about being fully qualified (as with Clinton and, perhaps, as you write, with Obama)--it's about being TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED.




Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 4:10:31 AM 
we'd be slamming the hell out of the Dems if they'd've nominated someone like Trump.

it's not about there being questions about being fully qualified (as with Clinton and, perhaps, as you write, with Obama)--it's about being TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED.


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 4:28:04 AM 
Because George Will is not a significant figure in Repub affairs.

http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20160803...


"...the cynicism required of those Republicans who persist in pretending that although Trump lies constantly and knows nothing, these blemishes do not disqualify him from being president."


WILL IS TELLING YOU THAT TRUMP IS NOT QUALIFIED IN ANY WAY.


Clue, get one.



Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
rpbobcat
General User

Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,495

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 6:52:20 AM 
Monroe Slavin wrote:
You are a freaking brick. You have your pre-conceived, echo-chamber notions and you won't let them go.

In contrast, I (and other rational people here) admit that Clinton is a flawed candidate (though within normal bounds for that)...AND we'd be slamming the hell out of the Dems if they'd've nominated someone like Trump.

And, it's not about there being questions about being fully qualified (as with Clinton and, perhaps as you write with Obama)--it's about being TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED.

Your inability to give up a point even in the face of overwhelming evidence is impressive though.



we'd be slamming the hell out of the Dems if they'd've nominated someone like Trump.

it's not about there being questions about being fully qualified (as with Clinton and, perhaps, as you write, with Obama)--it's about being TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED.




Again with the name calling ?

Apparently,you feel the only rational people on this thread are the ones who support Mrs. Clinton.

You said Mrs. Clinton being flawed is "within normal bounds for that".
What does that mean and what is it based on ?

You're entitled to your opinion that Mr.Trump in not qualified to be president.
I'm entitled to mine,that Mrs. Clinton isn't either.

Mr. Trump wasn't my first choice for the Republican nomination.I liked Kasich.
But,personally,I'd rather see Mr.Trump as president then Mrs. Rodham or is it
Rodham Clinton or just Clinton.Its hard to keep track.

You're not going to change my opinion,I'm not going to change yours.
But I've never resorted to personal insults when challenging your position on this topic.







Back to Top
  
.
General User

Member Since: 2/3/2005
Post Count: 2,949

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 1:20:43 PM 
rpbobcat wrote:
Mrs. Rodham or is it Rodham Clinton or just Clinton.Its hard to keep track.


Actually, it's not hard to keep track. You just kept track of it right there.

Or were you trying to make a larger point that women shouldn't be able to decide how they'd like to be referred?



Back to Top
  
Robert Fox
General User

Member Since: 11/16/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 1:43:00 PM 
Brian Smith wrote:
rpbobcat wrote:
Mrs. Rodham or is it Rodham Clinton or just Clinton.Its hard to keep track.


Actually, it's not hard to keep track. You just kept track of it right there.

Or were you trying to make a larger point that women shouldn't be able to decide how they'd like to be referred?





Oy vey... Where's my eye-roll emoji?
Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 2:11:16 PM 
rpbobcat wrote:
Monroe Slavin wrote:
You are a freaking brick. You have your pre-conceived, echo-chamber notions and you won't let them go.

In contrast, I (and other rational people here) admit that Clinton is a flawed candidate (though within normal bounds for that)...AND we'd be slamming the hell out of the Dems if they'd've nominated someone like Trump.

And, it's not about there being questions about being fully qualified (as with Clinton and, perhaps as you write with Obama)--it's about being TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED.

Your inability to give up a point even in the face of overwhelming evidence is impressive though.



we'd be slamming the hell out of the Dems if they'd've nominated someone like Trump.

it's not about there being questions about being fully qualified (as with Clinton and, perhaps, as you write, with Obama)--it's about being TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED.




Again with the name calling ?

Apparently,you feel the only rational people on this thread are the ones who support Mrs. Clinton.

You said Mrs. Clinton being flawed is "within normal bounds for that".
What does that mean and what is it based on ?

You're entitled to your opinion that Mr.Trump in not qualified to be president.
I'm entitled to mine,that Mrs. Clinton isn't either.

Mr. Trump wasn't my first choice for the Republican nomination.I liked Kasich.
But,personally,I'd rather see Mr.Trump as president then Mrs. Rodham or is it
Rodham Clinton or just Clinton.Its hard to keep track.

You're not going to change my opinion,I'm not going to change yours.
But I've never resorted to personal insults when challenging your position on this topic.










Again you miss the two points.


First, it's about Trump. No one has argued much for Clinton and I've repeatedly acknowledged that she has flaws.

It's about Trump being totally unqualified based on what he's shown so far.

Can't recall Dems ever going after Romney or any other major office candidate on grounds of 'not even qualified.'

Then add in the attacks by Trump's own side: Can anyone recall another major office candidate who was challenged by significant members of his own party, deemed unfit by signif parts of his own party?


Second, you show a remarkable ability to stick to your point of view without ever acknowledging or considering contrary evidence, without being able to admit that you may be wrong.

It's sad.



Ah, well. Barring major new developments, 'my side' is going to win the election....which is the point of it all.




Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
rpbobcat
General User

Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,495

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 3:36:40 PM 
Monroe Slavin wrote:
rpbobcat wrote:
Monroe Slavin wrote:
You are a freaking brick. You have your pre-conceived, echo-chamber notions and you won't let them go.

In contrast, I (and other rational people here) admit that Clinton is a flawed candidate (though within normal bounds for that)...AND we'd be slamming the hell out of the Dems if they'd've nominated someone like Trump.

And, it's not about there being questions about being fully qualified (as with Clinton and, perhaps as you write with Obama)--it's about being TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED.

Your inability to give up a point even in the face of overwhelming evidence is impressive though.



we'd be slamming the hell out of the Dems if they'd've nominated someone like Trump.

it's not about there being questions about being fully qualified (as with Clinton and, perhaps, as you write, with Obama)--it's about being TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED.




Again with the name calling ?

Apparently,you feel the only rational people on this thread are the ones who support Mrs. Clinton.

You said Mrs. Clinton being flawed is "within normal bounds for that".
What does that mean and what is it based on ?

You're entitled to your opinion that Mr.Trump in not qualified to be president.
I'm entitled to mine,that Mrs. Clinton isn't either.

Mr. Trump wasn't my first choice for the Republican nomination.I liked Kasich.
But,personally,I'd rather see Mr.Trump as president then Mrs. Rodham or is it
Rodham Clinton or just Clinton.Its hard to keep track.

You're not going to change my opinion,I'm not going to change yours.
But I've never resorted to personal insults when challenging your position on this topic.










Again you miss the two points.


First, it's about Trump. No one has argued much for Clinton and I've repeatedly acknowledged that she has flaws.

It's about Trump being totally unqualified based on what he's shown so far.

Can't recall Dems ever going after Romney or any other major office candidate on grounds of 'not even qualified.'

Then add in the attacks by Trump's own side: Can anyone recall another major office candidate who was challenged by significant members of his own party, deemed unfit by signif parts of his own party?


Second, you show a remarkable ability to stick to your point of view without ever acknowledging or considering contrary evidence, without being able to admit that you may be wrong.

It's sad.



Ah, well. Barring major new developments, 'my side' is going to win the election....which is the point of it all.







Monroe,
So what you're saying is that,since I don't agree with your position about Mrs. Clinton,I may be wrong.
Of course there's no chance you are.

No offense,as an engineer,I've seen steel less rigid then you.

As far as the Dems not going after some one as not qualified,guess you forgot about George Bush the younger.


Last Edited: 8/5/2016 3:38:13 PM by rpbobcat

Back to Top
  
Ryan Carey
Site Programmer



Member Since: 11/11/2004
Post Count: 948

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 4:30:23 PM 

Monroe Slavin wrote:
Second, you show a remarkable ability to stick to your point of view without ever acknowledging or considering contrary evidence, without being able to admit that you may be wrong.

Wow.


Ryan M. Carey
BBA 2001

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 4:46:00 PM 
I'm willing. Give me the evidence that Trump is qualified.

Yesterday, he announced a team which he'll consult on economic issues. Finally he begins to flesh out a team for governing.

But, to date, he's pretty much an everyday off-the-rails experience...proving he's too reckless to be President. Reckless and petty in an unprecedented way.

Please present the evidence that this is not so.

I'm willing.



Heck, it's a lot of fund to watch Trump's out-of-control.

I enjoy the debate with those who think, apparently, that he's qualified.

Winning.





Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
bobcatsquared
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,999

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 7:14:13 PM 
"I’m embarrassed, I’m ashamed,” former Ohio Attorney General Betty Montgomery (Republican) told The Columbus Dispatch, adding she doesn't “see any scenario" in which she will support Trump in November.

While in the same boat at Betty Montgomery, I can see that "scenario" being Monroe's banal, redundant, and close-minded posts pushing me to do the unthinkable: voting for the person less qualified than any eligible candidate for our country's highest office - Donald Trump.

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 8:39:34 PM 
There are pure, straight on facts.

Then, there are situations that are pretty much facts, situations that only those who are stubborn intransigent refuse to recognize:

Solich a mediocre coach based on no title in 11 years in the weak MAC;

Trump unqualified as presidential candidate if you follow the news in the least.


Those who don't have their M.O. don't get it...get upset with me when I recognize reality.



I enjoy it. I'm always entertained by denial of reality.




Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
mid70sbobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 650

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/5/2016 9:39:29 PM 
Monroe Slavin wrote:
There are pure, straight on facts.

Then, there are situations that are pretty much facts, situations that only those who are stubborn intransigent refuse to recognize:

Solich a mediocre coach based on no title in 11 years in the weak MAC;

Trump unqualified as presidential candidate if you follow the news in the least.


Those who don't have their M.O. don't get it...get upset with me when I recognize reality.



I enjoy it. I'm always entertained by denial of reality.





Again you show your inability to actually analyze data. You claim Solich is 'mediocre' (based solely on no MACC). With a 57% winning percentage at Ohio he's actually as high as anyone in the last 100 years with the exception of Don Peden. So by your analysis -- or lack thereof --- all coaches at Ohio have been mediocre or worse (except for Peden). And if Schaus, McDavis and others felt Solich was doing such a poor job he'd not have been retained all these years. So who's right? Clearly not you!!

Go hijack another thread with your repetitive drivel.

Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,007

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/6/2016 1:31:12 PM 
This article from last Sunday's Dispatch is both interesting and disturbing.

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2016/07/31/...

Read the whole article and look at the chart on the left at the start of the article but this part near the end is what jolted me the most.

In separate research, Stanford University economist Matthew Gentzkow found that the quaint idea of “loyal opposition” has all but disappeared in America.

“Perhaps the most disturbing fact is that politics has become increasingly personal. We don’t see those on the other side as well-meaning people who happen to hold different opinions or to weight conflicting goals differently.

“We see them as unintelligent and selfish, with views so perverse that they can be explained only by unimaginable cluelessness or a dark ulterior motive. Either way, they pose a grave threat to our nation.”
Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/6/2016 4:20:40 PM 
mid70sbobcat wrote:
Monroe Slavin wrote:
There are pure, straight on facts.

Then, there are situations that are pretty much facts, situations that only those who are stubborn intransigent refuse to recognize:

Solich a mediocre coach based on no title in 11 years in the weak MAC;

Trump unqualified as presidential candidate if you follow the news in the least.


Those who don't have their M.O. don't get it...get upset with me when I recognize reality.



I enjoy it. I'm always entertained by denial of reality.





Again you show your inability to actually analyze data. You claim Solich is 'mediocre' (based solely on no MACC). With a 57% winning percentage at Ohio he's actually as high as anyone in the last 100 years with the exception of Don Peden. So by your analysis -- or lack thereof --- all coaches at Ohio have been mediocre or worse (except for Peden). And if Schaus, McDavis and others felt Solich was doing such a poor job he'd not have been retained all these years. So who's right? Clearly not you!!

Go hijack another thread with your repetitive drivel.




Sure, when you use inapposite criteria such as relative standing among Ohio coaches instead of realizing that the modern era (last 40-50 years roughly) is different. But the true comparison to his MAC contemporaries and even isolated on his own (none for 11 in a weak conference) reveals the truth.

I'm not sure how apparent inability to buy Solich out makes the case that he's not mediocre.

And the Solich situation is appropriate. The posts have been about 'qualified or not' and this is an OHIO forum.

Thank you.

I do admit that Solich is qualified, unlike Trump. It's just that Solich has proven himself 'in office' to not be able to get the job done.

Having one's M.O., having one's ability to grasp the essence of a situation would seem to be a good idea.








Last Edited: 8/6/2016 4:22:11 PM by Monroe Slavin


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
mid70sbobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 650

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/6/2016 9:48:24 PM 
Monroe Slavin wrote:
mid70sbobcat wrote:
Monroe Slavin wrote:
There are pure, straight on facts.

Then, there are situations that are pretty much facts, situations that only those who are stubborn intransigent refuse to recognize:

Solich a mediocre coach based on no title in 11 years in the weak MAC;

Trump unqualified as presidential candidate if you follow the news in the least.


Those who don't have their M.O. don't get it...get upset with me when I recognize reality.



I enjoy it. I'm always entertained by denial of reality.





Again you show your inability to actually analyze data. You claim Solich is 'mediocre' (based solely on no MACC). With a 57% winning percentage at Ohio he's actually as high as anyone in the last 100 years with the exception of Don Peden. So by your analysis -- or lack thereof --- all coaches at Ohio have been mediocre or worse (except for Peden). And if Schaus, McDavis and others felt Solich was doing such a poor job he'd not have been retained all these years. So who's right? Clearly not you!!

Go hijack another thread with your repetitive drivel.




Sure, when you use inapposite criteria such as relative standing among Ohio coaches instead of realizing that the modern era (last 40-50 years roughly) is different. But the true comparison to his MAC contemporaries and even isolated on his own (none for 11 in a weak conference) reveals the truth.

I'm not sure how apparent inability to buy Solich out makes the case that he's not mediocre.

And the Solich situation is appropriate. The posts have been about 'qualified or not' and this is an OHIO forum.

Thank you.

I do admit that Solich is qualified, unlike Trump. It's just that Solich has proven himself 'in office' to not be able to get the job done.

Having one's M.O., having one's ability to grasp the essence of a situation would seem to be a good idea.











Solich is a 'name' that put Ohio back on the road to being decent. His W-L percentage has us well above 'mediocre' (look that word up in case you don't know the definition). Almost 60% wins is not mediocre by anyone's standards. 30% would be mediocre. Maybe even 40%. But not 60%. You seem to be the single data point out of 100 or more who feels compelled to say that anything short of a MACC makes us mediocre. There are more criteria to analyze in assessing any employed person's performance. I would think you'd know that in the business world. So you are a statistical outlier .. or a data point that gets thrown out.

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/7/2016 12:48:11 PM 
All over America today, employees were told that, despite not hitting the first main and obvious goal for which they were hired and despite a record built on triumphs in weak/easy situations, they will have a statue erected for them in respect of their mediocrity.


Despite the obviousness of their mediocrity.


How's that Benghazi going?
How are Trump's prospects at this time?








Last Edited: 8/7/2016 12:49:17 PM by Monroe Slavin


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
rpbobcat
General User

Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,495

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/7/2016 7:17:48 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
This article from last Sunday's Dispatch is both interesting and disturbing.

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2016/07/31/...

Read the whole article and look at the chart on the left at the start of the article but this part near the end is what jolted me the most.

In separate research, Stanford University economist Matthew Gentzkow found that the quaint idea of “loyal opposition” has all but disappeared in America.

“Perhaps the most disturbing fact is that politics has become increasingly personal. We don’t see those on the other side as well-meaning people who happen to hold different opinions or to weight conflicting goals differently.

“We see them as unintelligent and selfish, with views so perverse that they can be explained only by unimaginable cluelessness or a dark ulterior motive. Either way, they pose a grave threat to our nation.”


I read a story about this a while back.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan talked about how people on both sides of the aisle including their families used to socialize after work and on weekends.

He said it was much easier to work with someone when you knew them as a "person".

Today that doesn't happen, especially since Congress "gets out of Dodge" every weekend, to go home and fund raise.
Plus, a lot of members of Congress have their families stay in their home state.

So now, all both sides see is "party".

Last Edited: 8/8/2016 7:11:25 AM by rpbobcat

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/9/2016 12:16:55 AM 
Another thing that somewhat prominent people on both sides of the aisle are doing is stating that they won't vote for Trump.

On the Repub side, in an unprecedented way.

Many days to go but if Trump doesn't break the momentum....


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/9/2016 10:41:19 AM 




https://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-national-security-trump-re...





Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/10/2016 3:22:20 AM 
From the people who brought you Dan Quayle, Sarah Palin, and Bush II:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/25/donald-trump...


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
rpbobcat
General User

Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,495

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/11/2016 6:34:47 AM 
There was a funny,but telling quote in today's paper about the election.

A woman said that deciding who to vote for this year is like trying to figure out whether to cut off your right arm or your left arm.

Last Edited: 8/11/2016 12:18:47 PM by rpbobcat

Back to Top
  
Jeff McKinney
Moderator

Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,028

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/11/2016 9:54:07 AM 
rpbobcat wrote:
There was a funny,but telling quote in toady's paper about the election.

A woman said that deciding who to vote for this year is like trying to figure out whether to cut off your right arm or your left arm.


Who were they toadying up to?

Badumpdumpdumpchshshshshshshsh
Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/11/2016 6:39:23 PM 
No; Trump and Clinton are not equivalent in the way that your two arms are.

Or in any other significant way.

Trump is Trump.

Hillary is not.

May not be the highest of calling cards.

But this year, it's correct.



Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Nice Benghazi
   Posted: 8/12/2016 12:11:28 AM 
Yah, the number and prominence of Repub and/or conservative persons who are actively, in a committed way, disavowing Trump is unprecedented.

I'm an OldPerson and I can remember nothing anywhere near it. Prior to this year, I can't remember disavowals beyond the occasional single person speaking up.

Get clue: Like it or not, to this point I'm right on Trump and on Solich.



Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  76 - 100  of 121 Posts
Jump to Page:  < Previous    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5    Next >
View Other 'General Ohio University Discussion/Alumni Events' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties