Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting FOOTBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting MESSAGE BOARD Message Home - Ohio Basketball - Ohio Basketball Recruiting - The O Zone - Ohio Football - Ohio Football Recruiting - Ohio Volleyball - Ohio Baseball - Ohio Olympic Sports... - General OU Discussion... - Website Feedback... - Posting Policy Edit My Profile Private Messages Logout CHAT LINKS site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Basketball Topic:  RE: Wadly granted release Topic:  RE: Wadly granted release Author Message bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,706 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/12/2016 11:30:54 PM  Actually the reason behind the rule as discussed amongst the folks at the NCAA level is that they believe it is a huge upheaval for an athlete to switch schools, assimilate into a new student body, get classes to transfer and get back on a graduation track, sort out credits that will or won't transfer, get the lay of the land, mesh into their new team and a variety of other things that are a bit more complex than walking into a gym and playing ball. They really do look at the athlete and how much it actually takes to academically meld into a new school situation...most of those changes being the academic challenges that all but 2 rounds of draft choices will need to deal with as a student in order become part of the new school then to graduate. never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top perimeterpost General User Member Since: 7/6/2010 Post Count: 3,165 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 12:24:38 AM  With Wadley's departure here's the roster break down by class- 2 Sr- Campbell, Kaminski 3 Jr- Simmons, Laster, Harley 4 So- Dartis, Block, Taylor, Gollon 2 Fr- (RS)Dozier, Carter Two scholarships available. I would be in favor of replacing Wadley with a 5th yr transfer if it was the right player. MY STATE. MY TEAM. Back to Top Monroe Slavin General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Oxnard, CA Post Count: 9,121 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 3:24:03 AM  bobcatsquared wrote: My only concern is whether or not Saul had an inkling this might happen and planned (recruited) accordingly. Otherwise, it's a little late in the game to be serious contenders for high school players. I'm going to assume that Saul and staff planned for this possibility. Dude, you can't really think that BetterCallSaul is that unworldly wise? If a coach isn't preparing for almost anything, let alone something as likely as this, I'm surprised said coach could find front door. What you are thinking. Where's the band?! WHERE"S THE BAND?! DesignspiritUSA.com The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping! Back to Top 71 BOBCAT General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Post Count: 1,854 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 8:49:26 AM  As we have all seen recently the players left for spring signing are questionable players at best. The 2 signed by SP in his 1st spring have not performed, Ryan Taylor transferred and Mike Laster is a marginal player at best. I kind of agree that a 5th year player may just be the best option. We need PG help and SP needs to bring in at least 1 come next fall during that signing period. GO BOBCATS Back to Top OUVan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Post Count: 5,580 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 8:54:57 AM  Jeff McKinney wrote: the123kid wrote: Hopefully Wadly is able to play next year. Is there a more obnoxious rule in College Athletics than players having to sit out a year? Never heard a good reason for why students have to sit out.... Here's a good reason: without this rule, it would be open season for schools to continually recruit from and raid the rosters of other schools. Yep, we would be a farm team for the big boys. Back to Top OU_Country General User Member Since: 12/6/2005 Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County Post Count: 8,320 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 9:21:10 AM  71 BOBCAT wrote: As we have all seen recently the players left for spring signing are questionable players at best. The 2 signed by SP in his 1st spring have not performed, Ryan Taylor transferred and Mike Laster is a marginal player at best. I kind of agree that a 5th year player may just be the best option. We need PG help and SP needs to bring in at least 1 come next fall during that signing period. GO BOBCATS I'm not sure Mike is "marginal", as much as Dartis is just a little better than him. Jerome Tillman was a late signee if I recall. He was quite marginal. ;) I agree with the general thought that signing everyone early to get the best opportunity for recruits that fit the mold of what the coaching staff wants. That said, I'd challenge your comments with two thoughts: 1) There are plenty of kids who wait to commit until late to see if they can get high major offers. They may not, and may be available to Saul & staff as an option. 2) There are good players who de-commit after a coaching staff they signed/committed to in the fall ends up getting fired. Take Maishe Danley that Ohio was recruiting as an example. Committed to Rutgers until the coaches were replaced. He has now "re-opened" his recruitment process, as he should in my opinion. Back to Top UpSan Bobcat General User Member Since: 8/30/2005 Location: Upper Sandusky, OH Post Count: 3,789 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 10:06:21 AM  As noted, there is a wide variety of the types of high school players still available at this point. Some of the ones Ohio has signed late recently include guys who didn't have many offers, and some of those guys have worked out better than others. But some of the guys who still are available are top-level recruits. It's not just guys who missed out on offers the first time. The #3 player in the country didn't decided until just the other day. There are guys of all levels of recruiting interest who have waited for various reasons. Back to Top Alan Swank General User Member Since: 12/11/2004 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 7,022 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 10:49:42 AM  bornacatfan wrote: Actually the reason behind the rule as discussed amongst the folks at the NCAA level is that they believe it is a huge upheaval for an athlete to switch schools, assimilate into a new student body, get classes to transfer and get back on a graduation track, sort out credits that will or won't transfer, get the lay of the land, mesh into their new team and a variety of other things that are a bit more complex than walking into a gym and playing ball. They really do look at the athlete and how much it actually takes to academically meld into a new school situation...most of those changes being the academic challenges that all but 2 rounds of draft choices will need to deal with as a student in order become part of the new school then to graduate. This description of the NCAA sounds like the definition of a helicopter parent to me. Academically meld into a new school situation? Millions of freshmen do it every year without the support structure provided to athletes. It's no big deal - show up, go to class and study. Back to Top bigtillyoopsupsideurhead General User Member Since: 12/1/2006 Location: Cincinnati Post Count: 1,925 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 11:00:17 AM  71 BOBCAT wrote: As we have all seen recently the players left for spring signing are questionable players at best. The 2 signed by SP in his 1st spring have not performed, Ryan Taylor transferred and Mike Laster is a marginal player at best. I kind of agree that a 5th year player may just be the best option. We need PG help and SP needs to bring in at least 1 come next fall during that signing period. GO BOBCATS Jerome Tillman, Ivo Baltic, Travis Wilkins all late signing period guys. So were Ryan Taylor and Ethan Jacobs. Yah, the last two guys transferred out, but they were both solid players. There is talent out there with guys like Rodney Culver and Desmond Bane, probably more to be discovered too. It would be great to get a 5th year player who can play right away, but that would probably be a big or a wing, not a PG. I can't imagine any PG is going to willingly spend their final season playing 5 minutes a game behind Jaaron, unless its a Chandler Thomas type transfer. Back to Top OU_Country General User Member Since: 12/6/2005 Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County Post Count: 8,320 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 11:40:11 AM  bigtillyoopsupsideurhead wrote: 71 BOBCAT wrote: As we have all seen recently the players left for spring signing are questionable players at best. The 2 signed by SP in his 1st spring have not performed, Ryan Taylor transferred and Mike Laster is a marginal player at best. I kind of agree that a 5th year player may just be the best option. We need PG help and SP needs to bring in at least 1 come next fall during that signing period. GO BOBCATS Jerome Tillman, Ivo Baltic, Travis Wilkins all late signing period guys. So were Ryan Taylor and Ethan Jacobs. Yah, the last two guys transferred out, but they were both solid players. There is talent out there with guys like Rodney Culver and Desmond Bane, probably more to be discovered too. It would be great to get a 5th year player who can play right away, but that would probably be a big or a wing, not a PG. I can't imagine any PG is going to willingly spend their final season playing 5 minutes a game behind Jaaron, unless its a Chandler Thomas type transfer. The only 5th year guy I've wondered about is the kid from Michigan - Albrecht. I've no idea if he's a fit, but he is available, and has played at a high level in the past. Back to Top bobcatsquared General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Post Count: 5,034 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 3:03:48 PM  OU_Country wrote: bobcatsquared wrote: My only concern is whether or not Saul had an inkling this might happen and planned (recruited) accordingly. Otherwise, it's a little late in the game to be serious contenders for high school players. I'm going to assume that Saul and staff planned for this possibility. It wouldn't surprise me if one of the incoming players, if they're a frosh, was red-shirted from the start. There is also the real potential that they just hold onto this scholarship for next fall. OU Country, thank you for the respectful and insightful response. Amazingly, it didn't take you 7K-plus posts to display such quality insight. Back to Top OU_Country General User Member Since: 12/6/2005 Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County Post Count: 8,320 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/13/2016 4:00:57 PM  bobcatsquared wrote: OU_Country wrote: bobcatsquared wrote: My only concern is whether or not Saul had an inkling this might happen and planned (recruited) accordingly. Otherwise, it's a little late in the game to be serious contenders for high school players. I'm going to assume that Saul and staff planned for this possibility. It wouldn't surprise me if one of the incoming players, if they're a frosh, was red-shirted from the start. There is also the real potential that they just hold onto this scholarship for next fall. OU Country, thank you for the respectful and insightful response. Amazingly, it didn't take you 7K-plus posts to display such quality insight. You're welcome. I'm not sure how insightful I am. ;) I just look at who we already have and figure Saul isn't going to play 10-12 deep, so we'll likely see him push a player back for a year, or hold on to the scholly for the fall period. I can't see three frosh getting major PT with the returnees, so at least one almost HAS to red-shirt by the time November rolls around. Back to Top Speaker of Truth General User Member Since: 1/26/2011 Post Count: 441 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/15/2016 2:51:18 PM  OUVan wrote: Jeff McKinney wrote: the123kid wrote: Hopefully Wadly is able to play next year. Is there a more obnoxious rule in College Athletics than players having to sit out a year? Never heard a good reason for why students have to sit out.... Here's a good reason: without this rule, it would be open season for schools to continually recruit from and raid the rosters of other schools. Yep, we would be a farm team for the big boys. Why does this matter? These are student athletes that you are putting their freedom to make a decision for their own well being underneath your fear they may want to play at a better school? Just make a rule that schools can't recruit other players. Why punish the student athletes because other people are going to act poorly? What if a student wants to transfer to a school because it is better academically? These are student athletes right? Students first, that's why they can't be paid. Again, I ask....Is there any good reason why student athletes have to sit out a year? Back to Top Speaker of Truth General User Member Since: 1/26/2011 Post Count: 441 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/15/2016 2:54:15 PM  bornacatfan wrote: Actually the reason behind the rule as discussed amongst the folks at the NCAA level is that they believe it is a huge upheaval for an athlete to switch schools, assimilate into a new student body, get classes to transfer and get back on a graduation track, sort out credits that will or won't transfer, get the lay of the land, mesh into their new team and a variety of other things that are a bit more complex than walking into a gym and playing ball. They really do look at the athlete and how much it actually takes to academically meld into a new school situation...most of those changes being the academic challenges that all but 2 rounds of draft choices will need to deal with as a student in order become part of the new school then to graduate. Borna, I can't say I disgree with that line of thinking, but shouldn't that be a decision for the student athlete to make? The rule clearly isn't in place from an academic standpoint, this is just the NCAA covering their tracks. If they cared about academics, they would play all games on the weekends to minimize missed class, have less practice hours, etc, What if they wanted to transfer to a better school academically? Back to Top bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,706 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/15/2016 4:36:49 PM  the123kid wrote: Borna, I can't say I disgree with that line of thinking, but shouldn't that be a decision for the student athlete to make? The rule clearly isn't in place from an academic standpoint, this is just the NCAA covering their tracks. If they cared about academics, they would play all games on the weekends to minimize missed class, have less practice hours, etc, What if they wanted to transfer to a better school academically? Just the messenger here repeating what the folks at the NCAA here in Indy are saying from ME on down in interviews I have watched and heard. Met a lady on the plane to Utah that worked in NCAA Compliance and listened to her talk about transfers in terms of acclimitizing to the new situation, getting credits to transfer and majors straight in the new school, getting on track with tutors and lots of things I had not given much thought. I don't have their view of student athletes but I better understand their bigger picture view. FWIW...I think it is right to sit a year for reasons on many levels... in actuality ...it is a free year of school. I fail to see, for the guys who are not lottery picks, why that would be a bad thing. never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top bigtillyoopsupsideurhead General User Member Since: 12/1/2006 Location: Cincinnati Post Count: 1,925 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/15/2016 5:19:49 PM  the123kid wrote: OUVan wrote: Jeff McKinney wrote: the123kid wrote: Hopefully Wadly is able to play next year. Is there a more obnoxious rule in College Athletics than players having to sit out a year? Never heard a good reason for why students have to sit out.... Here's a good reason: without this rule, it would be open season for schools to continually recruit from and raid the rosters of other schools. Yep, we would be a farm team for the big boys. Why does this matter? These are student athletes that you are putting their freedom to make a decision for their own well being underneath your fear they may want to play at a better school? Just make a rule that schools can't recruit other players. Why punish the student athletes because other people are going to act poorly? What if a student wants to transfer to a school because it is better academically? These are student athletes right? Students first, that's why they can't be paid. Again, I ask....Is there any good reason why student athletes have to sit out a year? You are being naive if you think any more than 5% of transfers move schools because of academic reasons. Guys transfer to get more playing time, or in a lot of the grad transfers cases to play at a better school. If you want to get rid of the Transfer Redshirt rule fine, but be prepared for the NCAA to turn into the NBA where everyone is on an expiring contract every year. Back to Top Speaker of Truth General User Member Since: 1/26/2011 Post Count: 441 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/15/2016 6:04:42 PM  bigtillyoopsupsideurhead wrote: the123kid wrote: OUVan wrote: Jeff McKinney wrote: the123kid wrote: Hopefully Wadly is able to play next year. Is there a more obnoxious rule in College Athletics than players having to sit out a year? Never heard a good reason for why students have to sit out.... Here's a good reason: without this rule, it would be open season for schools to continually recruit from and raid the rosters of other schools. Yep, we would be a farm team for the big boys. Why does this matter? These are student athletes that you are putting their freedom to make a decision for their own well being underneath your fear they may want to play at a better school? Just make a rule that schools can't recruit other players. Why punish the student athletes because other people are going to act poorly? What if a student wants to transfer to a school because it is better academically? These are student athletes right? Students first, that's why they can't be paid. Again, I ask....Is there any good reason why student athletes have to sit out a year? You are being naive if you think any more than 5% of transfers move schools because of academic reasons. Guys transfer to get more playing time, or in a lot of the grad transfers cases to play at a better school. If you want to get rid of the Transfer Redshirt rule fine, but be prepared for the NCAA to turn into the NBA where everyone is on an expiring contract every year. I bet the % is less than 5% maybe even 1%. That's not the point, the point is that they're restricting these students from doing what they desire to do. Scholarships are 1 year contracts FYI, take a look at kids that get kicked of teams or released. Kaminski is a great example, Coach makes a decision that costs him a year and he has no say in the matter. I agree that it will hurt schools like OU, but who are we to say what schools a guy should attend? Back to Top Alan Swank General User Member Since: 12/11/2004 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 7,022 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/15/2016 6:19:43 PM  [/QUOTE] I bet the % is less than 5% maybe even 1%. That's not the point, the point is that they're restricting these students from doing what they desire to do. Scholarships are 1 year contracts FYI, take a look at kids that get kicked of teams or released. Kaminski is a great example, Coach makes a decision that costs him a year and he has no say in the matter. I agree that it will hurt schools like OU, but who are we to say what schools a guy should attend? [/QUOTE] No, they are restricting athletes from doing what they desire. It's Ohio University not Ohio FC. Nowhere in the founding principles of any college or university does it state that they exist for the purpose of promoting intercollegiate athletic competition. Back to Top colobobcat66 General User Member Since: 9/1/2006 Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO Post Count: 4,155 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/15/2016 8:35:38 PM  Alan Swank wrote: I bet the % is less than 5% maybe even 1%. That's not the point, the point is that they're restricting these students from doing what they desire to do. Scholarships are 1 year contracts FYI, take a look at kids that get kicked of teams or released. Kaminski is a great example, Coach makes a decision that costs him a year and he has no say in the matter. I agree that it will hurt schools like OU, but who are we to say what schools a guy should attend? [/QUOTE] No, they are restricting athletes from doing what they desire. It's Ohio University not Ohio FC. Nowhere in the founding principles of any college or university does it state that they exist for the purpose of promoting intercollegiate athletic competition. [/QUOTE] The rules don't prevent a student from attending where they want, they just don't get to play varsity athletics for a year. What's wrong with a little more education? Re Kaminski-I think he needed a year to mature and grow up some. He got into trouble multiple times with Izzo. I don't think coach made "the" decision, I lay that on the kid. He had a big say in the matter. I don't think that he should lose a year of eligibility because he sat it out though. Last Edited: 4/16/2016 12:59:38 PM by colobobcat66 Back to Top Speaker of Truth General User Member Since: 1/26/2011 Post Count: 441 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/16/2016 3:34:46 PM  Alan Swank wrote: I bet the % is less than 5% maybe even 1%. That's not the point, the point is that they're restricting these students from doing what they desire to do. Scholarships are 1 year contracts FYI, take a look at kids that get kicked of teams or released. Kaminski is a great example, Coach makes a decision that costs him a year and he has no say in the matter. I agree that it will hurt schools like OU, but who are we to say what schools a guy should attend? [/QUOTE] No, they are restricting athletes from doing what they desire. It's Ohio University not Ohio FC. Nowhere in the founding principles of any college or university does it state that they exist for the purpose of promoting intercollegiate athletic competition. [/QUOTE] Alan, I agree with you. Based on what you say, there should be no reason for a student to have to sit out a year. Am I reading it wrong? Back to Top Speaker of Truth General User Member Since: 1/26/2011 Post Count: 441 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/16/2016 3:36:40 PM  colobobcat66 wrote: Alan Swank wrote: I bet the % is less than 5% maybe even 1%. That's not the point, the point is that they're restricting these students from doing what they desire to do. Scholarships are 1 year contracts FYI, take a look at kids that get kicked of teams or released. Kaminski is a great example, Coach makes a decision that costs him a year and he has no say in the matter. I agree that it will hurt schools like OU, but who are we to say what schools a guy should attend? No, they are restricting athletes from doing what they desire. It's Ohio University not Ohio FC. Nowhere in the founding principles of any college or university does it state that they exist for the purpose of promoting intercollegiate athletic competition. [/QUOTE] The rules don't prevent a student from attending where they want, they just don't get to play varsity athletics for a year. What's wrong with a little more education? Re Kaminski-I think he needed a year to mature and grow up some. He got into trouble multiple times with Izzo. I don't think coach made "the" decision, I lay that on the kid. He had a big say in the matter. I don't think that he should lose a year of eligibility because he sat it out though. [/QUOTE] Kenny might've needed a year to mature, I can't argue that. I have no problem with a Coach kicking a player off a team, but if he does so, there is no reason a player should have to sit out. The rules are extremely stacked against the athletes, they have no right or say in anything that affects them. Rules are made by the people who are profiting the most. Back to Top bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,706 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/16/2016 8:33:04 PM  the123kid wrote: Kenny might've needed a year to mature, I can't argue that. I have no problem with a Coach kicking a player off a team, but if he does so, there is no reason a player should have to sit out. The rules are extremely stacked against the athletes, they have no right or say in anything that affects them. Rules are made by the people who are profiting the most. Give me some real examples of rules being stacked against athletes. I am not following that. Seems to me both parties have a leg up on each other. When you are basing your professional life on the actions and whims of 18 to 22 year olds you both have a situation where you depend on each other for success. How is the balance totally tipped in the favor of the institution or coach?. How does that compare to 20 30 years ago or have we reconsidered how we view coach/player relations and athlete/institutional responsibilities? Obviously, the coaches who are like Bobby Knight or the situation at Rutgers have been unacceptable in this day and generation but do we have a situation brewing where the athletes are their own agents and run the program? How is it there such and obvious disparity where the consensus is that the rules are "extremely" stacked against the athletes and what do you base your personal experiences non anecdotal judgements on? never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top OUVan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Post Count: 5,580 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/17/2016 12:15:21 AM  the123kid wrote: Just make a rule that schools can't recruit other players. That rule is already in place but that didn't stop a big school from trying to get DJ to transfer after his freshman season. Relying on a rule not to be broken is ridiculous. Sorry but without having to sit out there would be teams fielding almost all walk-on teams. I really don't see the problem with making them sit out a year. They don't lose a year of eligibility unless they transfer more than once. Back to Top colobobcat66 General User Member Since: 9/1/2006 Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO Post Count: 4,155 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/17/2016 8:13:37 AM  OUVan wrote: the123kid wrote: Just make a rule that schools can't recruit other players. That rule is already in place but that didn't stop a big school from trying to get DJ to transfer after his freshman season. Relying on a rule not to be broken is ridiculous. Sorry but without having to sit out there would be teams fielding almost all walk-on teams. I really don't see the problem with making them sit out a year. They don't lose a year of eligibility unless they transfer more than once. I thought Kaminski lost a year of eligibility? Back to Top bigtillyoopsupsideurhead General User Member Since: 12/1/2006 Location: Cincinnati Post Count: 1,925 Status: Offline     RE: Wadly granted release    Posted: 4/17/2016 10:58:10 AM  colobobcat66 wrote: OUVan wrote: the123kid wrote: Just make a rule that schools can't recruit other players. That rule is already in place but that didn't stop a big school from trying to get DJ to transfer after his freshman season. Relying on a rule not to be broken is ridiculous. Sorry but without having to sit out there would be teams fielding almost all walk-on teams. I really don't see the problem with making them sit out a year. They don't lose a year of eligibility unless they transfer more than once. I thought Kaminski lost a year of eligibility? Players get 5 years to play 4 seasons, but unfortunately Kaminski redshirted his first year at MSU following shoulder surgery. There is a chance he can gain a 6th year of eligibility, but unfortunately we won't know until next year. Former Cincinnati and Ball State player Jeremiah Davis was just granted a 6th year of eligibility in a similar situation so there is a chance Kaminski could get one as well. Back to Top Showing Replies:   26 - 50  of 66 Posts Jump to Page:   < Previous    1 | 2 | 3    Next > View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 234 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 234 Guests 0 Registered Users There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties